心理学报
心理學報
심이학보
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY
2013年
2期
243-252
,共10页
认知诊断%认知诊断模型%属性层级关系%属性判准率
認知診斷%認知診斷模型%屬性層級關繫%屬性判準率
인지진단%인지진단모형%속성층급관계%속성판준솔
cognitive diagnosis%cognitive diagnosis model%attribute hierarchy%attribute match ratio
当前国际上开发了60多种认知诊断计量模型(Fu & Li,2007),各种模型各具特点,实际应用者应根据实际情况选用恰当的模型.本研究以属性层级关系为切入点,采用 Monte Carlo 模拟的研究方法,比较了属性层级关系正确及有误两种情况下,当前国际上常用的五种认知诊断模型的性能,以充分考察不同认知诊断模型对属性层级关系的依赖程度,及属性层级关系的错误界定对各认知诊断模型诊断正确率的影响,从而为实际运用者在认知诊断模型选用上提供借鉴和参考.
噹前國際上開髮瞭60多種認知診斷計量模型(Fu & Li,2007),各種模型各具特點,實際應用者應根據實際情況選用恰噹的模型.本研究以屬性層級關繫為切入點,採用 Monte Carlo 模擬的研究方法,比較瞭屬性層級關繫正確及有誤兩種情況下,噹前國際上常用的五種認知診斷模型的性能,以充分攷察不同認知診斷模型對屬性層級關繫的依賴程度,及屬性層級關繫的錯誤界定對各認知診斷模型診斷正確率的影響,從而為實際運用者在認知診斷模型選用上提供藉鑒和參攷.
당전국제상개발료60다충인지진단계량모형(Fu & Li,2007),각충모형각구특점,실제응용자응근거실제정황선용흡당적모형.본연구이속성층급관계위절입점,채용 Monte Carlo 모의적연구방법,비교료속성층급관계정학급유오량충정황하,당전국제상상용적오충인지진단모형적성능,이충분고찰불동인지진단모형대속성층급관계적의뢰정도,급속성층급관계적착오계정대각인지진단모형진단정학솔적영향,종이위실제운용자재인지진단모형선용상제공차감화삼고.
@@@@Attribute hierarchy structure (AHS), which was considered as the basis of cognitive diagnosis, could largely affect the classification accuracy. However, in practical work, it was very difficult to determine whether the specified AHS was rational or not. Thus, it is necessary to explore how the AHS will affect the classification accuracy. @@@@This paper investigated the effect of different AHSs on the accuracy of diagnosis. And two AHSs were under investigation, one is the correctly identified AHS and the other is the incorrectly identified AHS. @@@@The commonly used Monte Carlo simulation method was employed to generate the data. And five cognitive diagnostic models, Rule Space Model (RSM), Attribute Hierarchy Model (AHM), General Distance Decision (GDD) Model, DINA_HC model and DINA model, were used to fit the same data. @@@@The results indicated that: @@@@(1) When the AHS was correctly identified, the attribute match ratios (AMRs) under RSM and AHM were both relatively low, while the AMRs under GDD, DINA_HC and DINA models were all relatively high. Furthermore, the AMRs under DINA_HC and DINA models were larger than that of GDD model. @@@@(2) When the AHS was incorrectly identified, the AMRs under RSM, AHM and GDD models were all relatively smaller compared to the case in which AHS was correctly identified, which indicated that the AHS significantly affects the accuracy of diagnosis of the RSM, AHM and GDD models. On the other hand, the influence of AHS on the accuracy of the diagnosis of DINA_HC model was moderate. But the accuracy of the diagnosis of DINA model will not be influenced by the AHS because the AHS information was not used in the DINA model.