医药前沿
醫藥前沿
의약전연
YIAYAO QIANYAN
2013年
11期
23-24
,共2页
根尖基点%牙胶尖%根管治疗术
根尖基點%牙膠尖%根管治療術
근첨기점%아효첨%근관치료술
Apical tip of root canal%Master gutta-percha%Root canal treatments
目的评价根尖基点(根尖狭窄口)直径确定对选用大于相应直径为主牙胶尖进行根尖充填的临床效果.方法选取我科诊治的牙髓炎和根尖周炎病例120例各有1颗患牙,常规开髓揭顶备洞,确定根管工作长度,分成实验组和对照组各有60例患牙,实验组:用确定根尖基点(根尖狭窄口)直径,常规根管预备和消毒,选用比根尖基点直径大的牙胶尖为主牙胶尖和根管糊剂进行侧向加压充填.对照组:常规根管预备和消毒,选用根管工作长度的牙胶尖和根管糊剂进行侧向加压充.结果实验组3例欠充2mm,恰充57例,无疼痛出现,对照组1例欠充2mm,恰充46例,超充13例,充后当天出现疼痛5例,4例无需服药,7天后疼痛消失,1例重新治疗后并口服消炎止痛药2天.结论确定根尖基点(根尖狭窄口)直径选好主牙胶尖进行根管充填,对提高根管治疗水平有明显疗效.
目的評價根尖基點(根尖狹窄口)直徑確定對選用大于相應直徑為主牙膠尖進行根尖充填的臨床效果.方法選取我科診治的牙髓炎和根尖週炎病例120例各有1顆患牙,常規開髓揭頂備洞,確定根管工作長度,分成實驗組和對照組各有60例患牙,實驗組:用確定根尖基點(根尖狹窄口)直徑,常規根管預備和消毒,選用比根尖基點直徑大的牙膠尖為主牙膠尖和根管糊劑進行側嚮加壓充填.對照組:常規根管預備和消毒,選用根管工作長度的牙膠尖和根管糊劑進行側嚮加壓充.結果實驗組3例欠充2mm,恰充57例,無疼痛齣現,對照組1例欠充2mm,恰充46例,超充13例,充後噹天齣現疼痛5例,4例無需服藥,7天後疼痛消失,1例重新治療後併口服消炎止痛藥2天.結論確定根尖基點(根尖狹窄口)直徑選好主牙膠尖進行根管充填,對提高根管治療水平有明顯療效.
목적평개근첨기점(근첨협착구)직경학정대선용대우상응직경위주아효첨진행근첨충전적림상효과.방법선취아과진치적아수염화근첨주염병례120례각유1과환아,상규개수게정비동,학정근관공작장도,분성실험조화대조조각유60례환아,실험조:용학정근첨기점(근첨협착구)직경,상규근관예비화소독,선용비근첨기점직경대적아효첨위주아효첨화근관호제진행측향가압충전.대조조:상규근관예비화소독,선용근관공작장도적아효첨화근관호제진행측향가압충.결과실험조3례흠충2mm,흡충57례,무동통출현,대조조1례흠충2mm,흡충46례,초충13례,충후당천출현동통5례,4례무수복약,7천후동통소실,1례중신치료후병구복소염지통약2천.결론학정근첨기점(근첨협착구)직경선호주아효첨진행근관충전,대제고근관치료수평유명현료효.
@@@@Objective To evaluate clinical effects of determining root and opening (apical tip of the narrow root canal) diameters for selection of wider master gutta-percha points on root canal filing. Methods 120 patients from our department treated for either pulpitis or apical periodontitis were selected. The conventional procedures such as opening dental pulp cavity and determine the working length of the root canal were performed.Patients were divided into two groups (experimental and control) by 60 cases each. Experimental group: The root end opening (apical tip of the narrow root canal) diameters was measured and determined. Conventional root canal preparation and disinfection were performed. Master gutta-percha that was wider than the apical base tip diameter was selected and root canal sealer was applied by lateral pressure filing. Control group: Conventional root canal preparation and disinfection were performed. Master gutta-percha that was matched with root canal length was selected and root canal sealer was applied by lateral pressure filing. Results Experimental group: 3 cases less filed by 2 mm and 57 cases normal filed. Al were painless. Control group: 1 case less filed 2 mm, 46 cases normal filed, and 13 cases over filed. 5 cases complained pain on the same day. Among them 4 cases did not take medication and pain disappeared after 7 days. One case was re-treated and taken oral anti-inflammatory medicines to relieve pain for two days. Conclusions Determining root end opening (apical tip of the narrow root canal) diameters prior to select master gutta-percha helps to improve clinical applications of root canal treatments.