CAJ | 학술논문

目的:研究两种方法同型交叉配血的结果及其对于临床安全输血的意义.方法:分别用两种方法对360份临床受血者标本进行交叉配血,仔细观察并记录交叉配血结果.结果:360份临床受血者标本用微柱凝胶法有349份标本配血结果相合(主侧或次则无凝集无溶血为相合),有11份标本结果为±~+的凝集,为配血不相合(主侧或次侧有凝集或溶血为不相合);凝聚胺法有357份标本为配血结果相合,有3份标本为配血结果不相合,而这3份标本用微柱凝胶法配血其结果亦为不相合,两种方法交叉配血的结果差异有统计学意义(X2=4.16,P<0.05).结论:用微柱凝胶卡进行交叉配血灵敏度更高、结果更容易观察,更能减少临床输血不良反应的发生.
목적:연구량충방법동형교차배혈적결과급기대우림상안전수혈적의의.방법:분별용량충방법대360빈림상수혈자표본진행교차배혈,자세관찰병기록교차배혈결과.결과:360빈림상수혈자표본용미주응효법유349빈표본배혈결과상합(주측혹차칙무응집무용혈위상합),유11빈표본결과위±~+적응집,위배혈불상합(주측혹차측유응집혹용혈위불상합);응취알법유357빈표본위배혈결과상합,유3빈표본위배혈결과불상합,이저3빈표본용미주응효법배혈기결과역위불상합,량충방법교차배혈적결과차이유통계학의의(X2=4.16,P<0.05).결론:용미주응효잡진행교차배혈령민도경고、결과경용역관찰,경능감소림상수혈불량반응적발생.
Objective: Studies two methods to match the blood alternately the result and regarding the clinical security blood transfusion significance. Method: Uses two methods clinicaly to carry on separately to 360 the blood specimen matches alternately the blood, observes carefuly and records matches the blood result alternately. Result: 360 clinical are had the blood specimen with the micro column gelatin law 349 specimens to match the blood result to coincide (host side or time does not have without agglutination hematolysis for to coincide), some 11 sign owner side or inferior side result for ±~+ the agglutination, for matches the blood not to coincide (host side either inferior side has agglutination or hematolysis for does not coincide); The condensation amine law has 357 specimens for to match the blood result to coincide, some 3 specimens for match the blood result not to coincide, but these 3 specimens match the blood result with micro column gelatin French penicilin blood it also for not to coincide, two methods match the blood the result difference to have statistics significance alternately (X2=4.16, P< 0.05). Conclusion: Carries on with the micro column gelatin card matches the blood sensitivity to be higher alternately, the result is easier to observe, can reduce the occurrence which the clinical blood transfusion responded not good.