CAJ | 학술논문

目的对比观察3M Filtek Z350流动复合树脂与Pekaseal光固化窝沟封闭剂预防儿童恒磨牙龋病的临床效果.方法对2009年1月至2011年6月间本院门诊符合纳入标准的126名6~10岁儿童的315颗恒磨牙随机分为两组,观察组选择3M Filtek Z350流动复合树脂进行窝沟封闭治疗(病例数=63,牙数=136),对照组采用Pekaseal光固化窝沟封闭剂进行窝沟封闭治疗(病例数=63,牙数=179),随访6个月~1年,复查封闭剂保留情况和患龋情况.结果术后6个月观察组和对照组窝沟封闭剂保留率无统计学差异(P>0.05),术后1年观察组封闭剂保留率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).术后6个月、1年,观察组患龋率均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论采用3M Filtek Z350流动复合树脂进行窝沟封闭预防儿童恒磨牙窝沟龋效果显著,使龋病发生率大大降低,优于传统的窝沟封闭剂,值得临床推广应用.
목적대비관찰3M Filtek Z350류동복합수지여Pekaseal광고화와구봉폐제예방인동항마아우병적림상효과.방법대2009년1월지2011년6월간본원문진부합납입표준적126명6~10세인동적315과항마아수궤분위량조,관찰조선택3M Filtek Z350류동복합수지진행와구봉폐치료(병례수=63,아수=136),대조조채용Pekaseal광고화와구봉폐제진행와구봉폐치료(병례수=63,아수=179),수방6개월~1년,복사봉폐제보류정황화환우정황.결과술후6개월관찰조화대조조와구봉폐제보류솔무통계학차이(P>0.05),술후1년관찰조봉폐제보류솔고우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).술후6개월、1년,관찰조환우솔균저우대조조,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론채용3M Filtek Z350류동복합수지진행와구봉폐예방인동항마아와구우효과현저,사우병발생솔대대강저,우우전통적와구봉폐제,치득림상추엄응용.
Objective?To compare the preventive effect of 3M Filtek Z350 flowable resin and Pekaseal light-cured pit and fissure sealant for caries in children. Methods One hundred and twenty six children aged 6 to 10 years were selected to perform sealant technique on their first permanent molars. First molars in trial group were sealed with 3M Filtek Z350 flowable resin and in control group were sealed with Pekaseal light-cured sealant. Sealant retention rate and caries prevalence were observed during 1-year follow up. Rusults At 6-month follow up, there were no statistical difference in sealant retention rate between the two groups(P>0.05). At 1 year follow up, the retention rate of flowable resin group was significantly higher than that of light-cured sealant group(P<0.05). However,caries prevalence of flowable resin group was significantly lower than that of light-cured sealant group at both 6-month and 1-year follow up(P<0.05).Conclusion 3M Filtek Z350 flowable resin is superior to pekaseal light-cured pit and fissure sealant to prevent caries in children.