当代医学
噹代醫學
당대의학
CHINA CONTEMPORARY MEDICINE
2013年
16期
1-3
,共3页
心脏磁共振%高血压%高血压合并左室肥厚:左心室功能
心髒磁共振%高血壓%高血壓閤併左室肥厚:左心室功能
심장자공진%고혈압%고혈압합병좌실비후:좌심실공능
Cardiac magnetic resonance%Hypertension%Hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy%Left ventricular function
目的利用磁共振成像技术评估高血压病左室肥厚患者的左心功能.方法回顾性分析太原市中心医院收集到的22例健康志愿者(A组)、35例原发性高血压(EH)不合并左心室肥厚(LVH)者(B组)、16例原发性高血压合并左心室肥厚者(C组)的临床资料.用Siemens公司1.5 T超导型磁共振扫描仪(Sonata)分别对三组进行扫描,采用argus软件测量各组左心室功能参数,并对A组左心室功能参数与B、C两组分别进行比较;对B、C两组进行组间比较.结果对照组与B组、C组的射血分数(EF)、左室高峰射血率(PER)、高峰射血时间(TPER)、高峰充盈率(PFR)、高峰充盈时间分别比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);B组与C组的各项指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论利用磁共振成像技术可以全面评估左心室肥厚患者的心功能;高血压可引起左心室的收缩、舒张功能减低,并且高血压合并左室肥厚可进一步加重收缩、舒张功能的改变.
目的利用磁共振成像技術評估高血壓病左室肥厚患者的左心功能.方法迴顧性分析太原市中心醫院收集到的22例健康誌願者(A組)、35例原髮性高血壓(EH)不閤併左心室肥厚(LVH)者(B組)、16例原髮性高血壓閤併左心室肥厚者(C組)的臨床資料.用Siemens公司1.5 T超導型磁共振掃描儀(Sonata)分彆對三組進行掃描,採用argus軟件測量各組左心室功能參數,併對A組左心室功能參數與B、C兩組分彆進行比較;對B、C兩組進行組間比較.結果對照組與B組、C組的射血分數(EF)、左室高峰射血率(PER)、高峰射血時間(TPER)、高峰充盈率(PFR)、高峰充盈時間分彆比較,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05);B組與C組的各項指標比較,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論利用磁共振成像技術可以全麵評估左心室肥厚患者的心功能;高血壓可引起左心室的收縮、舒張功能減低,併且高血壓閤併左室肥厚可進一步加重收縮、舒張功能的改變.
목적이용자공진성상기술평고고혈압병좌실비후환자적좌심공능.방법회고성분석태원시중심의원수집도적22례건강지원자(A조)、35례원발성고혈압(EH)불합병좌심실비후(LVH)자(B조)、16례원발성고혈압합병좌심실비후자(C조)적림상자료.용Siemens공사1.5 T초도형자공진소묘의(Sonata)분별대삼조진행소묘,채용argus연건측량각조좌심실공능삼수,병대A조좌심실공능삼수여B、C량조분별진행비교;대B、C량조진행조간비교.결과대조조여B조、C조적사혈분수(EF)、좌실고봉사혈솔(PER)、고봉사혈시간(TPER)、고봉충영솔(PFR)、고봉충영시간분별비교,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05);B조여C조적각항지표비교,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론이용자공진성상기술가이전면평고좌심실비후환자적심공능;고혈압가인기좌심실적수축、서장공능감저,병차고혈압합병좌실비후가진일보가중수축、서장공능적개변.
Objective MRI assess left ventricular function in patients with left ventricular hypertensive of hypertensive.Methods Retrospective analysis of the hospital in Taiyuan city center collected 22 cases of healthy volunteers(A group) 、essential hypertension (EH) 35 example is in group B and essential hypertension following left ventricular hypertrophy 16 example is the C group. Application of Siemens company 1.5 T type superconducting MRI scanner (Sonata) respectively to three groups scanned, using Argus software to measure the left ventricular function parameters,and Group A left ventricular function parameters to compare the two groups (B, C), respectively;groups B, C, between groups comparison. Results A group and B group the ejection fraction (EF), left ventricular peak ejection rate (PER) the the peak ejection time (TPER), peak filling rate (PFR), peak filling time were compared, differences were statistical significance (P<0.05);A group with the indicators of group C were compared to a combination of B group C, the indicators comparison, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion MRI(magnetic resonance imaging) technology can be overall assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy patients with cardiac function;High blood pressure can cause left ventricular diastolic function of shrinkage reducing, and hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy can accentuate further contraction diastolic function change.