中国医疗前沿
中國醫療前沿
중국의료전연
CHINA HEALTHCARE INNOVATION
2013年
9期
60-61
,共2页
自体动静脉内瘘%血液透析%手术方式
自體動靜脈內瘺%血液透析%手術方式
자체동정맥내루%혈액투석%수술방식
Autogenous Arteriovenous Fistula%Hemodialysis%Operation methods
目的分析三种自体动静脉内瘘手术方式差异,对比其临床特点和并发症情况,为内瘘手术方式选择提供参考.方法72例手术患者,根据手术方式的不同分为前臂内瘘手术组、鼻烟窝内瘘手术组和肘关节内瘘手术组,分别进行手术,观察手术持续时间、内瘘成熟时间、并发症发生情况、术后第8周内瘘大小、血流量、内瘘静脉直径、对心功能影响等指标.结果三种手术方式手术持续时间无显著性差异(P>0.05),内瘘成熟时间差异有统计学意义(F=36.423,P=0.000),在并发症发生、第8周内瘘口大小、血流量、静脉直径及对心脏功能影响方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论根据患者临床特点、血管情况进行内瘘手术方式的选择可实现动静脉内瘘的最优化建立.
目的分析三種自體動靜脈內瘺手術方式差異,對比其臨床特點和併髮癥情況,為內瘺手術方式選擇提供參攷.方法72例手術患者,根據手術方式的不同分為前臂內瘺手術組、鼻煙窩內瘺手術組和肘關節內瘺手術組,分彆進行手術,觀察手術持續時間、內瘺成熟時間、併髮癥髮生情況、術後第8週內瘺大小、血流量、內瘺靜脈直徑、對心功能影響等指標.結果三種手術方式手術持續時間無顯著性差異(P>0.05),內瘺成熟時間差異有統計學意義(F=36.423,P=0.000),在併髮癥髮生、第8週內瘺口大小、血流量、靜脈直徑及對心髒功能影響方麵差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論根據患者臨床特點、血管情況進行內瘺手術方式的選擇可實現動靜脈內瘺的最優化建立.
목적분석삼충자체동정맥내루수술방식차이,대비기림상특점화병발증정황,위내루수술방식선택제공삼고.방법72례수술환자,근거수술방식적불동분위전비내루수술조、비연와내루수술조화주관절내루수술조,분별진행수술,관찰수술지속시간、내루성숙시간、병발증발생정황、술후제8주내루대소、혈류량、내루정맥직경、대심공능영향등지표.결과삼충수술방식수술지속시간무현저성차이(P>0.05),내루성숙시간차이유통계학의의(F=36.423,P=0.000),재병발증발생、제8주내루구대소、혈류량、정맥직경급대심장공능영향방면차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론근거환자림상특점、혈관정황진행내루수술방식적선택가실현동정맥내루적최우화건립.
@@@@Objective To analyze the differences、clinical characters and complications of three types of autogenous arteriovenous(AV) fistulas for hemodialysis, so as to provide guidance foroperation methods and their clinical application to hemodialysis. Methods 72 patients undergoing autogenous AV fistula procedures were divided into wrist AV fistula group(48 cases), snuf-box AVfistula group(14 cases) and elbow AV fistula group(10 cases) accordingto color doppler Ultrasonographic evaluation before operation. The operation time, mature time of AVF, complication data and diameter of AVF, blood flow for hemodialysis, venous diameter and influence on cardiac functionwere recorded. Results Operation time of the three types of operation showed no statistic difference(P>0.05). there is statistic difference in AVF mature time(F=36.423,P=0.000); The differences of complications data, diameter of AVF, blood flow for hemodialysis, venous diameter and influence on cardiac function in the three groups is not significant(P>0.05). Conclusion Color Doppler Ultrasonographic evaluation and clinical characters can provide optimal choice for AVF operation. Snuf-box AV fistula can be the first choice for patients with satisfactory vascular access, while elbow AV istula can be used for those with poor vascular access or with forearm fistula failure.