中国现代药物应用
中國現代藥物應用
중국현대약물응용
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN DRUG APPLICATION
2015年
2期
24-25
,共2页
注射用尤瑞克林%急性进展性脑梗死%临床疗效
註射用尤瑞剋林%急性進展性腦梗死%臨床療效
주사용우서극림%급성진전성뇌경사%림상료효
Urinary kallidinogenase for injection%Acute progressive cerebral infarction%Clinical effect
目的:观察注射用尤瑞克林治疗急性进展性脑梗死的临床疗效及不良反应。方法急性进展性脑梗死住院患者128例,随机分为对照组和观察组,对照组(64例)应用常规治疗方案,观察组(64例)在常规治疗方案基础上加用注射用尤瑞克林0.15 PNA,1次/d,疗程14 d,观察两组在治疗前及治疗后14 d的神经功能缺损程度(NIHSS)评分、日常生活活动能力(ADL)评分、临床疗效及不良反应发生情况。结果两组患者治疗后14 d NIHSS、ADL评分均较治疗前明显改善(P<0.05);观察组显著高于对照组(P<0.05);临床有效率达81.3%,显著高于对照组68.8%(P<0.05),两组均未发现严重不良反应。结论注射用尤瑞克林治疗急性进展性脑梗死有效并且相对安全。
目的:觀察註射用尤瑞剋林治療急性進展性腦梗死的臨床療效及不良反應。方法急性進展性腦梗死住院患者128例,隨機分為對照組和觀察組,對照組(64例)應用常規治療方案,觀察組(64例)在常規治療方案基礎上加用註射用尤瑞剋林0.15 PNA,1次/d,療程14 d,觀察兩組在治療前及治療後14 d的神經功能缺損程度(NIHSS)評分、日常生活活動能力(ADL)評分、臨床療效及不良反應髮生情況。結果兩組患者治療後14 d NIHSS、ADL評分均較治療前明顯改善(P<0.05);觀察組顯著高于對照組(P<0.05);臨床有效率達81.3%,顯著高于對照組68.8%(P<0.05),兩組均未髮現嚴重不良反應。結論註射用尤瑞剋林治療急性進展性腦梗死有效併且相對安全。
목적:관찰주사용우서극림치료급성진전성뇌경사적림상료효급불량반응。방법급성진전성뇌경사주원환자128례,수궤분위대조조화관찰조,대조조(64례)응용상규치료방안,관찰조(64례)재상규치료방안기출상가용주사용우서극림0.15 PNA,1차/d,료정14 d,관찰량조재치료전급치료후14 d적신경공능결손정도(NIHSS)평분、일상생활활동능력(ADL)평분、림상료효급불량반응발생정황。결과량조환자치료후14 d NIHSS、ADL평분균교치료전명현개선(P<0.05);관찰조현저고우대조조(P<0.05);림상유효솔체81.3%,현저고우대조조68.8%(P<0.05),량조균미발현엄중불량반응。결론주사용우서극림치료급성진전성뇌경사유효병차상대안전。
Objective To observe the clinical effect and adverse reactions of urinary kallidinogenase for injection in the treatment of acute progressive cerebral infarction. Methods A total of 128 patients with acute progressive cerebral infarction were randomly divided into control group and observation group. The control group (n=64) received conventional treatment method, while the observation group (n=64) was treated by additional 0.15 PNA urinary kallidinogenase for injection by 1time/d for 14 d. National institutes of health stroke scale (NIHSS), activities of daily living (ADL) score, clinical effects, and adverse reactions were observed in the two groups before and after 14 d of treatment. Results The scores of NIHSS and ADL were all improved after 14 d of treatment in the two groups (P<0.05), and those in the observation group were higher than in the control group (P<0.05). The clinical effective rate of the observation group was 81.3%, which was obviously higher than 68.8%of the control group (P<0.05). No severe adverse reactions were found in the two groups. Conclusion Treatment of acute progressive cerebral infarction by urinary kallidinogenase for injection is effective and relatively safe.