教育生物学杂志
教育生物學雜誌
교육생물학잡지
2014年
3期
157-162
,共6页
羞怯%社交淡漠%社交回避%应对策略%社会退缩
羞怯%社交淡漠%社交迴避%應對策略%社會退縮
수겁%사교담막%사교회피%응대책략%사회퇴축
shyness%unsociability%avoidance%coping strategies%social withdrawal
目的:考察不同类型社会退缩儿童人际冲突应对策略的差异。方法采用个体为中心的分析方法,使用羞怯量表、独处偏好量表、应对策略量表对2072名3~8年级学生进行测量,并对不同类型社会退缩儿童人际冲突应对策略的得分进行组间比较。结果①在寻求社会支持策略和问题解决策略上,三类社会退缩儿童均低于非退缩儿童,但三类儿童间不存在显著差异;②在内化应对策略上,社交回避儿童得分最高,其次为羞怯儿童和社交淡漠儿童,非退缩儿童得分最低;③在外化应对策略上,社交回避儿童得分最高,社交淡漠儿童其次,羞怯儿童第三,三者均高于非退缩儿童;④在回避应对策略上,社交回避和社交淡漠儿童得分最高,其次为羞怯儿童,非退缩儿童得分最低。结论与非退缩儿童相比,社会退缩儿童倾向采用消极的应对策略应对人际冲突,其中回避型社会退缩儿童的问题最为突出。
目的:攷察不同類型社會退縮兒童人際遲突應對策略的差異。方法採用箇體為中心的分析方法,使用羞怯量錶、獨處偏好量錶、應對策略量錶對2072名3~8年級學生進行測量,併對不同類型社會退縮兒童人際遲突應對策略的得分進行組間比較。結果①在尋求社會支持策略和問題解決策略上,三類社會退縮兒童均低于非退縮兒童,但三類兒童間不存在顯著差異;②在內化應對策略上,社交迴避兒童得分最高,其次為羞怯兒童和社交淡漠兒童,非退縮兒童得分最低;③在外化應對策略上,社交迴避兒童得分最高,社交淡漠兒童其次,羞怯兒童第三,三者均高于非退縮兒童;④在迴避應對策略上,社交迴避和社交淡漠兒童得分最高,其次為羞怯兒童,非退縮兒童得分最低。結論與非退縮兒童相比,社會退縮兒童傾嚮採用消極的應對策略應對人際遲突,其中迴避型社會退縮兒童的問題最為突齣。
목적:고찰불동류형사회퇴축인동인제충돌응대책략적차이。방법채용개체위중심적분석방법,사용수겁량표、독처편호량표、응대책략량표대2072명3~8년급학생진행측량,병대불동류형사회퇴축인동인제충돌응대책략적득분진행조간비교。결과①재심구사회지지책략화문제해결책략상,삼류사회퇴축인동균저우비퇴축인동,단삼류인동간불존재현저차이;②재내화응대책략상,사교회피인동득분최고,기차위수겁인동화사교담막인동,비퇴축인동득분최저;③재외화응대책략상,사교회피인동득분최고,사교담막인동기차,수겁인동제삼,삼자균고우비퇴축인동;④재회피응대책략상,사교회피화사교담막인동득분최고,기차위수겁인동,비퇴축인동득분최저。결론여비퇴축인동상비,사회퇴축인동경향채용소겁적응대책략응대인제충돌,기중회피형사회퇴축인동적문제최위돌출。
Objective To investigate the differences in the coping styles in response to potential interpersonal conflicts among different subtypes of socially-withdrawn children. Methods A sample of 2 072 3rd to 8th grade students was administrated with Childre n’s Shyness Questionnaire, Preference for Solitude Scale and Self-Report Coping Scale. Person-centered analyses were employed to compare the differences in the coping styles among different subtypes of socially-withdrawn children. Results ① Socially-withdrawn children had lower scores on seeking social support and solving problem than did non-withdrawn children, but there was no difference among the three subtypes. ② Socially-withdrawn children had higher scores on internalizing coping strategies than did non-withdrawn children. Among the three subtypes, socially-avoidant children had higher scores than did unsociable and shy children.③Socially-withdrawn children had higher scores on externalizing coping strategies than did non-withdrawn children. Among the three subtypes, socially-avoidant children had higher scores than did unsociable children, and unsociable children had higher scores than did shy children.④Socially-withdrawn children had higher scores on avoidance coping strategies than did non-withdrawn children. Among the three subtypes , socially-avoidant and unsociable children had higher scores than did shy children . Conclusion Compared to non-withdrawn children, socially-withdrawn children are inclined to use negative coping strategies to deal with interpersonal conflicts, especially the socially-avoidant children.