中华实验和临床病毒学杂志
中華實驗和臨床病毒學雜誌
중화실험화림상병독학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL VIROLOGY
2014年
6期
488-490
,共3页
尿%显微镜检查
尿%顯微鏡檢查
뇨%현미경검사
Urine%Microscopy
目的 探讨并比较用不同原理的尿液有形成分全自动分析仪进行尿液定量检测与非离心镜检计数的关系.方法 采用UF-500i全自动尿液有形成分分析仪、AVE-764全自动尿有形成分镜检分析仪和人工显微镜检查分别测定我院522份住院患者的尿液中的有形成分,比较尿液有形成分定量分析方法之间的差异.结果 以标准显微镜检查法为标准,UF-500i全自动尿液有形成分分析仪和AVE-764全自动尿有形成分镜检分析仪对尿液中有形成分的测定结果与显微镜法的测定结果间差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).以红细胞超过25个/μl、白细胞超过30个/μl,管型超过1个/μl和上皮细胞超过15个/μl为阳性界值,3种方法检测红细胞的完全符合率为68.8％,白细胞为80.4％,管型为75.3％,上皮细胞为56.1％.AVE-764测红细胞的特异性和敏感性为92.9％、84.1％,白细胞为88.2％、83.1％,管型为91.6％、75.4％,上皮细胞为48.4％、76.8％.UF-500i测红细胞的特异性和敏感性为74.1％、75.3％,白细胞为89.9％、82.5％,管型为85.4％、61％,上皮细胞为90％、87.6％.结论 UF-500i和AVE-764全自动尿有形成分分析仪对尿液中有形成分的定量计数与标准的人工显微镜检查的符合率高,比较能够满足临床的需求.
目的 探討併比較用不同原理的尿液有形成分全自動分析儀進行尿液定量檢測與非離心鏡檢計數的關繫.方法 採用UF-500i全自動尿液有形成分分析儀、AVE-764全自動尿有形成分鏡檢分析儀和人工顯微鏡檢查分彆測定我院522份住院患者的尿液中的有形成分,比較尿液有形成分定量分析方法之間的差異.結果 以標準顯微鏡檢查法為標準,UF-500i全自動尿液有形成分分析儀和AVE-764全自動尿有形成分鏡檢分析儀對尿液中有形成分的測定結果與顯微鏡法的測定結果間差異無統計學意義(P＞0.05).以紅細胞超過25箇/μl、白細胞超過30箇/μl,管型超過1箇/μl和上皮細胞超過15箇/μl為暘性界值,3種方法檢測紅細胞的完全符閤率為68.8％,白細胞為80.4％,管型為75.3％,上皮細胞為56.1％.AVE-764測紅細胞的特異性和敏感性為92.9％、84.1％,白細胞為88.2％、83.1％,管型為91.6％、75.4％,上皮細胞為48.4％、76.8％.UF-500i測紅細胞的特異性和敏感性為74.1％、75.3％,白細胞為89.9％、82.5％,管型為85.4％、61％,上皮細胞為90％、87.6％.結論 UF-500i和AVE-764全自動尿有形成分分析儀對尿液中有形成分的定量計數與標準的人工顯微鏡檢查的符閤率高,比較能夠滿足臨床的需求.
목적 탐토병비교용불동원리적뇨액유형성분전자동분석의진행뇨액정량검측여비리심경검계수적관계.방법 채용UF-500i전자동뇨액유형성분분석의、AVE-764전자동뇨유형성분경검분석의화인공현미경검사분별측정아원522빈주원환자적뇨액중적유형성분,비교뇨액유형성분정량분석방법지간적차이.결과 이표준현미경검사법위표준,UF-500i전자동뇨액유형성분분석의화AVE-764전자동뇨유형성분경검분석의대뇨액중유형성분적측정결과여현미경법적측정결과간차이무통계학의의(P＞0.05).이홍세포초과25개/μl、백세포초과30개/μl,관형초과1개/μl화상피세포초과15개/μl위양성계치,3충방법검측홍세포적완전부합솔위68.8％,백세포위80.4％,관형위75.3％,상피세포위56.1％.AVE-764측홍세포적특이성화민감성위92.9％、84.1％,백세포위88.2％、83.1％,관형위91.6％、75.4％,상피세포위48.4％、76.8％.UF-500i측홍세포적특이성화민감성위74.1％、75.3％,백세포위89.9％、82.5％,관형위85.4％、61％,상피세포위90％、87.6％.결론 UF-500i화AVE-764전자동뇨유형성분분석의대뇨액중유형성분적정량계수여표준적인공현미경검사적부합솔고,비교능구만족림상적수구.
Objective To evaluate and compare the quantitative methods of detecting urinary formed elements and counting without centrifugal microscopy examination by different UF-500i fully automated urine cell analyzer.Methods Urinary formed elements were detected in specimens by UF-500i fully automated urine cell analyzer,AVE-764 fully automation urinalysis analyzer and microscopic quantitation in un-centrifuged samples of the 522 patients from our hospital,and analyze the difference between the three quantitative methods of detecting urinary formed elements.Results Using the microscopic quantitation in un-centrifuged samples as standard,Urinary formed elements were detected in specimens by UF-500i fully automated urine cell analyzer,AVE-764 fully automation urinalysis analyzer without notable difference(P ＞ 0.05).With the positive cut off value of 25 per μl for RBC,30 per μl for WBC,1 per μl for cast and 15 per μl for epithelia,the complete concordances were 68.8％ for RBC,80.4％ for WBC,75.3％ for cast,56.1％ for epithelia.The specificity and sensitivity of RBC was 92.9％,84.1％,WBC was 88.2％,83.1％,cast was 91.6％,75.4％,epithelia was 48.4％,76.8％ by AVE-764 respectively.The specificity and sensitivity of RBC was 74.1％,75.3％,WBC was 89.9％,82.5％,cast was 85.4％,61％,epithelia was 90％,87.6％ by UF-500i respectively.Conclusion The urinary formed elements identification and counting of UF-500i and AVE-764 is great similar to standard manual microscopic examination and can fulfill the requirements of clinical examination.
