CAJ | 학술논문

寻找质疑牵连犯处断原则的新理由，应当结合我国刑法学的理论体系和刑法典的具体规定。牵连犯作为刑法学范畴，与罪数理论的判断标准以及其在罪数理论的体系安排上均存在不协调之处。况且从现行刑法规定与司法解释的规定上看，牵连犯的应用也屡屡受阻。刑法学界新近出现的一些观点，通过对牵连犯的概念进行有限的改造，试图维护牵连犯从一重处断的原则，亦在逻辑论证和结论证成上存在诸多破绽。牵连犯从一重处断原则实难在当下刑法学理论和刑法制度体系中寻找合适的地位。
심조질의견련범처단원칙적신이유，응당결합아국형법학적이론체계화형법전적구체규정。견련범작위형법학범주，여죄수이론적판단표준이급기재죄수이론적체계안배상균존재불협조지처。황차종현행형법규정여사법해석적규정상간，견련범적응용야루루수조。형법학계신근출현적일사관점，통과대견련범적개념진행유한적개조，시도유호견련범종일중처단적원칙，역재라집론증화결론증성상존재제다파탄。견련범종일중처단원칙실난재당하형법학이론화형법제도체계중심조합괄적지위。
The new reason for doubtness toward the punishment principle for implicated offenses can be found in the theoretical system and the specific provisions of our criminal law .The implicated offense is definitely within criminal law , and it usually conflicts with the theory of crime number , either its judgment standard or its system ar-rangement .Besides , from the provisions of the current criminal law and its judicial interpretations , the application of implicated offenses also fails to go smoothly .Even though the concept of implicated offenses has been slightly re-formed in criminal law educational world , making an attempt to maintain its severe punishment principle , the impli-cated offenses are still not perfect in the logical argumentation .Therefore, it is a long way to go before the severe punishment principle for implicated offenses find its right position in the present theories and system of criminal law .