中国科技论文
中國科技論文
중국과기논문
Sciencepaper Online
2014年
11期
1237-1242
,共6页
水利工程%水量水质联合调度%风险分析%多目标模糊综合决策
水利工程%水量水質聯閤調度%風險分析%多目標模糊綜閤決策
수리공정%수량수질연합조도%풍험분석%다목표모호종합결책
hydraulic engineering%water quality and quantity multi-operation%risk analysis%multi-obj ective fuzzy comprehensive decision-making
为了对淮河流域水质水量联合调度方案进行风险分析,模拟了10个调度方案,包括实时调度方案、人机交互方案和优化调度方案,选取淮河流域2个主要污染物指标CODMn和NH3-N,分别计算各方案下2种水质指标超标风险率和超标程度;同时,进一步考虑调度过程中可能产生的防洪风险和供水风险,采用多目标模糊综合决策的方法,分别考虑上述2种水质6个指标,以水质监测断面界首、鲁台子和蚌埠闸为决策断面,计算得到7种情景下各方案的优劣排序。结果表明,实时调度方案在各种情境下风险最小,为最优调度方案,人机交互方案(方案3、方案4和方案5)在各种情景下风险均比较大,为最劣方案。
為瞭對淮河流域水質水量聯閤調度方案進行風險分析,模擬瞭10箇調度方案,包括實時調度方案、人機交互方案和優化調度方案,選取淮河流域2箇主要汙染物指標CODMn和NH3-N,分彆計算各方案下2種水質指標超標風險率和超標程度;同時,進一步攷慮調度過程中可能產生的防洪風險和供水風險,採用多目標模糊綜閤決策的方法,分彆攷慮上述2種水質6箇指標,以水質鑑測斷麵界首、魯檯子和蚌埠閘為決策斷麵,計算得到7種情景下各方案的優劣排序。結果錶明,實時調度方案在各種情境下風險最小,為最優調度方案,人機交互方案(方案3、方案4和方案5)在各種情景下風險均比較大,為最劣方案。
위료대회하류역수질수량연합조도방안진행풍험분석,모의료10개조도방안,포괄실시조도방안、인궤교호방안화우화조도방안,선취회하류역2개주요오염물지표CODMn화NH3-N,분별계산각방안하2충수질지표초표풍험솔화초표정도;동시,진일보고필조도과정중가능산생적방홍풍험화공수풍험,채용다목표모호종합결책적방법,분별고필상술2충수질6개지표,이수질감측단면계수、로태자화방부갑위결책단면,계산득도7충정경하각방안적우렬배서。결과표명,실시조도방안재각충정경하풍험최소,위최우조도방안,인궤교호방안(방안3、방안4화방안5)재각충정경하풍험균비교대,위최렬방안。
In order to perform the risk analysis of the joint operation on water quality and quantity in Huai River Basin,ten opera-ted schemes,including real-time scheduling schemes,the human interaction scheduling schemes,and the optimization schemes, were simulated.Two kinds of water quality,CODMn and NH3-N,which are the main contaminants of Huai River Basin,were se-lected to characterize the exceeding risk ratio and risk degree among the proposed ten schemes.The Jieshou,Lutaizi and Bengbu sluides were taken as the dicision-making sections to consider the potential flood risk and water supply risk.Meanwhile,with the consideration of the above two water qualities and the correspingding six indexes,the optimal to worse order of the above ten schemes under seven different scenarios were obtained respectively by means of the multi-obj ective fuzzy comprehensive decision-making method.Results suggested that the real-time scheduling scheme 2 has the least risk under various scenarios,which was the best scheme.The optimal scheduling schemes of human interaction (scheme 3,4,and 5)suffer a relatively high risk,which were the worst ones.