CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨2种不同化学发光系统（安图 ADC CLIA 400和西门子 centaur xp）测定肿瘤标记物结果的可比性。方法在安图化学发光仪 ADC CLIA 400和西门子 centaur xp 化学免疫发光仪中进行50例标本肿瘤标记物的检测，分析比较结果。结果用2种化学发光法对血清标本进行定量分析结果表明2种检测系统的检测结果差异无统计学意义（P ＞0.05），5个项目在2种检测系统之间各相关系数均小于0.836，提示2种方法相关性较好。西门子 centaur xp 化学免疫发光仪检测肿瘤标记物的准确性，重复性高于安图化学发光仪 ADC CLIA 400。结论西门子 centaur xp 化学免疫发光仪检测肿瘤标记物优于安图化学发光仪 ADC CLIA 400。
목적：탐토2충불동화학발광계통（안도 ADC CLIA 400화서문자 centaur xp）측정종류표기물결과적가비성。방법재안도화학발광의 ADC CLIA 400화서문자 centaur xp 화학면역발광의중진행50례표본종류표기물적검측，분석비교결과。결과용2충화학발광법대혈청표본진행정량분석결과표명2충검측계통적검측결과차이무통계학의의（P ＞0.05），5개항목재2충검측계통지간각상관계수균소우0.836，제시2충방법상관성교호。서문자 centaur xp 화학면역발광의검측종류표기물적준학성，중복성고우안도화학발광의 ADC CLIA 400。결론서문자 centaur xp 화학면역발광의검측종류표기물우우안도화학발광의 ADC CLIA 400。
Objective To study the results comparability of two kinds of different chemiluminescence systems(Antu chemilumi-nescence analyzer ADC CLIA 400 and Siemens centaur xp)in the detection of tumor markers.Methods The tumor markers were detected in 50 specimens by using the Antu chemiluminescence analyzer ADC CLIA 400 and the Siemens centaur xp chemilumines-cence analyzer respectively.Then the results were analyzed and compared.Results The quantitative analysis results on the serum specimens showed that there was no significant difference in the detection results between the two kinds of detection system(P >0.05).The correlation coefficients of 5 test items between the two kinds of detection system were more than 0.836,suggesting a good correlation between the two kinds of method.The accuracy and repeatability of the Siemens centaur xp chemiluminescence ana-lyzer were higher than those of the Antu chemiluminescence analyzer ADC CLIA 400 in detecting the tumor markers.Conclusion The Siemens centaur xp chemiluminescence analyzer is better than the Antu chemiluminescence analyzer ADC CLIA 400 in detec-ting the tumor immune markers.