农业工程学报
農業工程學報
농업공정학보
2014年
22期
37-43
,共7页
崔思远%曹光乔%张文毅%朱晓星
崔思遠%曹光喬%張文毅%硃曉星
최사원%조광교%장문의%주효성
农业机械%农作物%生长%株行距%插秧效果%茎蘖动态
農業機械%農作物%生長%株行距%插秧效果%莖蘗動態
농업궤계%농작물%생장%주행거%삽앙효과%경얼동태
agricultural machinery%crops%growth%row spacing%effect of mechanical transplanting rice%tillering dynamics
为了比较不同行距插秧机的作业效果,以及机插秧不同株行距组合对水稻生长和产量的影响,在江苏靖江、张家港和黄海农场3地进行了连续2 a田间定位试验。每个试验点设置行株距分别为:30 cm×11 cm、25 cm×14 cm、25 cm×11 cm 3种株行距组合处理,3次重复。结果表明,在水稻漏插率方面,2012年30 cm×11 cm(行距×株距)处理最高,25 cm×11 cm(行距×株距)处理最低,2013年30 cm×11 cm(行距×株距)处理仍最高,25 cm×14 cm(行距×株距)处理最低。窄行距大株距有利于降低水稻漏插率,但在伤秧率、倒秧率方面和每穴平均株数方面,3个品种的不同处理之间均无统一规律;分蘖稳定后各试验点茎蘖数均为30 cm×11 cm(行距×株距)处理最高,25 cm×11 cm(行距×株距)处理最低,大株行距有利于促进水稻分蘖;产量方面各处理每公顷有效穗数30 cm×11 cm(行距×株距)处理<25 cm×11 cm(行距×株距)处理,其他产量构成因素差异不显著,最终各处理实际产量表现为25 cm×11 cm(行距×株距)处理较好,故插秧机行株距为25 cm×11 cm较适合于江苏省水稻机械化种植。该研究可为江苏省水稻插秧机机具选型提供参考。
為瞭比較不同行距插秧機的作業效果,以及機插秧不同株行距組閤對水稻生長和產量的影響,在江囌靖江、張傢港和黃海農場3地進行瞭連續2 a田間定位試驗。每箇試驗點設置行株距分彆為:30 cm×11 cm、25 cm×14 cm、25 cm×11 cm 3種株行距組閤處理,3次重複。結果錶明,在水稻漏插率方麵,2012年30 cm×11 cm(行距×株距)處理最高,25 cm×11 cm(行距×株距)處理最低,2013年30 cm×11 cm(行距×株距)處理仍最高,25 cm×14 cm(行距×株距)處理最低。窄行距大株距有利于降低水稻漏插率,但在傷秧率、倒秧率方麵和每穴平均株數方麵,3箇品種的不同處理之間均無統一規律;分蘗穩定後各試驗點莖蘗數均為30 cm×11 cm(行距×株距)處理最高,25 cm×11 cm(行距×株距)處理最低,大株行距有利于促進水稻分蘗;產量方麵各處理每公頃有效穗數30 cm×11 cm(行距×株距)處理<25 cm×11 cm(行距×株距)處理,其他產量構成因素差異不顯著,最終各處理實際產量錶現為25 cm×11 cm(行距×株距)處理較好,故插秧機行株距為25 cm×11 cm較適閤于江囌省水稻機械化種植。該研究可為江囌省水稻插秧機機具選型提供參攷。
위료비교불동행거삽앙궤적작업효과,이급궤삽앙불동주행거조합대수도생장화산량적영향,재강소정강、장가항화황해농장3지진행료련속2 a전간정위시험。매개시험점설치행주거분별위:30 cm×11 cm、25 cm×14 cm、25 cm×11 cm 3충주행거조합처리,3차중복。결과표명,재수도루삽솔방면,2012년30 cm×11 cm(행거×주거)처리최고,25 cm×11 cm(행거×주거)처리최저,2013년30 cm×11 cm(행거×주거)처리잉최고,25 cm×14 cm(행거×주거)처리최저。착행거대주거유리우강저수도루삽솔,단재상앙솔、도앙솔방면화매혈평균주수방면,3개품충적불동처리지간균무통일규률;분얼은정후각시험점경얼수균위30 cm×11 cm(행거×주거)처리최고,25 cm×11 cm(행거×주거)처리최저,대주행거유리우촉진수도분얼;산량방면각처리매공경유효수수30 cm×11 cm(행거×주거)처리<25 cm×11 cm(행거×주거)처리,기타산량구성인소차이불현저,최종각처리실제산량표현위25 cm×11 cm(행거×주거)처리교호,고삽앙궤행주거위25 cm×11 cm교괄합우강소성수도궤계화충식。해연구가위강소성수도삽앙궤궤구선형제공삼고。
In mechanical rice transplanting, hill-row spacing combination directly influenced the growth and yield of rice. To compare the effect of hill-row spacing on mechanical transplanting rice, the growth and yield of rice, we set up 2-year field experiments located in Zhangjiagang, Jingjiang and the Yellow Sea farm in Jiangsu Province, separately. The rice breed planted in Zhangjiagang, Jingjiang and the Yellow Sea farm was Wuyunjing 29, Wuyunjing24 and Lianjing 7, separately, all of which were japonica hybrid rice. There were 3 row-hill spacing treatments in—at each site, which the row spacing by hill spacing was 30 cm by 11 cm, 25 cm by 14 cm, 25 cm by 11 cm, each repeated 3 times. By the influence of the spacing, the area of 30 cm by 11 cm (row spacing by hill spacing), 25 cm by 14 cm (row spacing by hill spacing) and 25 cm by 11 cm (row spacing by hill spacing) was 135 m2, 150 m2 and 150 m2, separately. At the same site within each treatment, only the row-hill spacing differences were the mutation factors, the other factors were controlled. The effect of the mechanical transplanting rice, the tillering dynamics of rice, yield and yield composition of rice were tested. The effect of mechanical rice transplanting measured immediately after transplanting. 200 continuous points were taken in each area; the number of plants per hole, seedling injury and inverted were recorded to calculate the average number of plants per hole, drain planting rate, seedling injury rate and seedling inverted rate. To determine the tillering dynamic, the number of tillers was counted every 7 days from rice transplanting to the full panicle stage, 20 points for each plot were fixed. Actual yield of rice was determined after ripening. For each treatment, 3 m2 of rice were weighed after harvesting to calculate the actual yield, repeated 3 times. According to the average number of plants per hill, 3 hill plants were selected for testing, and then the yield component and the theoretical yield of rice were calculated. SPSS17.0 and Excel 2007 were used for the statistical analysis. The results are indicated below:1) Drain planting rate of 25 cm by 14 cm (row spacing by hill spacing) was the lowest, then was 25 cm by 11 cm (row spacing by hill spacing), 30 cm by 11 cm (row spacing by hill spacing) was the highest. These indicate that narrow row spacing large hill spacing was conducive to reducing the drain planting rate of rice. No rule was found from the rates of seedling injury and inverted in between these 3 breeds. 2) The number of tillers after tiller stabilization of 30 cm by 11 cm (row spacing by hill spacing) was the highest, and then was 25 cm by 14 cm (row spacing by hill spacing), 25 cm by 11 cm (row spacing by hill spacing) was the lowest. These indicate that large row spacing and hill spacing is conducive to the promotion of rice tillering. 3) In the aspect of the yield components, ears of 25 cm by 11 cm (row spacing by hill spacing) were the highest, and then were 25 cm by 14 cm (row spacing by hill spacing), 30 cm by 11 cm (row spacing by hill spacing) was the lowest. No rule was found between the grain numbers per spike, the seed rate and 1000-grain weight. Finally in the aspect of the theoretical rice yield and the actual rice yield, 25 cm by 11 cm(row spacing by hill spacing) was the highest, and then 25 cm by 14 cm (row spacing by hill spacing), 30 cm by 11 cm (row spacing by hill spacing) was the lowest. The theoretical rice yields of 25 cm by 11 cm (row spacing by hill spacing) were 9.68%-26.5%higher than 30 cm by 11 cm (row spacing by hill spacing), and the actual rice yields of 25 cm by 11 cm (row spacing by hill spacing) were 3.18%-20.6%higher than 30 cm by 11 cm (row spacing by hill spacing). The 25 cm by 11 cm (row spacing by hill spacing) row transplanter should be more suitable for mechanical rice planting in Jiangsu Province.