现代医药卫生
現代醫藥衛生
현대의약위생
MODERN MEDICINE HEALTH
2014年
23期
3554-3555
,共2页
色谱法,纸层%食品检查%真菌%国标法%霉菌检测
色譜法,紙層%食品檢查%真菌%國標法%黴菌檢測
색보법,지층%식품검사%진균%국표법%매균검측
Chromatography,paper%Food inspection%Fungi%National standard method%Mold detection
目的：比较纸片法和国标法对食品霉菌的检验效果。方法采样标本来自安徽省望江县疾病预防控制中心质管科送检的糕点、饮料等共416份，其中糕点317份，饮料99份。所有样本均同时采用纸片法和国标法进行霉菌检验，比较2种方法的检验效果。结果国标法检测糕点、饮料的合格率[75.7%（240/317）、63.6%（63/99）]与纸片法检测糕点、饮料的合格率[78.9%（250/317）、65.7%（65/99）]比较，差异均无统计学意义（χ2=0.899、0.088，P＞0.05）。结论2种方法均可准确检验食品中的霉菌，但相对国标法而言，纸片法更快速、简便、有效、实用，可替代国标法。
目的：比較紙片法和國標法對食品黴菌的檢驗效果。方法採樣標本來自安徽省望江縣疾病預防控製中心質管科送檢的糕點、飲料等共416份，其中糕點317份，飲料99份。所有樣本均同時採用紙片法和國標法進行黴菌檢驗，比較2種方法的檢驗效果。結果國標法檢測糕點、飲料的閤格率[75.7%（240/317）、63.6%（63/99）]與紙片法檢測糕點、飲料的閤格率[78.9%（250/317）、65.7%（65/99）]比較，差異均無統計學意義（χ2=0.899、0.088，P＞0.05）。結論2種方法均可準確檢驗食品中的黴菌，但相對國標法而言，紙片法更快速、簡便、有效、實用，可替代國標法。
목적：비교지편법화국표법대식품매균적검험효과。방법채양표본래자안휘성망강현질병예방공제중심질관과송검적고점、음료등공416빈，기중고점317빈，음료99빈。소유양본균동시채용지편법화국표법진행매균검험，비교2충방법적검험효과。결과국표법검측고점、음료적합격솔[75.7%（240/317）、63.6%（63/99）]여지편법검측고점、음료적합격솔[78.9%（250/317）、65.7%（65/99）]비교，차이균무통계학의의（χ2=0.899、0.088，P＞0.05）。결론2충방법균가준학검험식품중적매균，단상대국표법이언，지편법경쾌속、간편、유효、실용，가체대국표법。
Objective To compare the paper method and national standard method for food mould inspection. Methods Took 416 samples of pastries,drinks and others from the center quality management division in Wangjiang County Center for Disease Prevention and Control of Anhui province. inlcuding 317 pastries and 99 drinks ,all of which were sent to conduct mould inspection by paper method and national standard methods. It should be compared their results. Results Among them,the quali-fication rate of pastries and drinks by the national standard method was 75.5%and 63.%respectively while those by paper method 78.9%、65.7%,which showed the two methods had no statistcal significane in difference (χ2=0.899,0.088,P>0.05). Conclu-sion The two method is avaliable for mould inspection while the paper method is quicker ,simpler,more effective and more practical, who may replace the national standard method.
