山东农业大学学报(自然科学版)
山東農業大學學報(自然科學版)
산동농업대학학보(자연과학판)
JOURNAL OF SHANDONG AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE)
2014年
5期
670-674
,共5页
宋秀华%李传荣%许景伟%王超
宋秀華%李傳榮%許景偉%王超
송수화%리전영%허경위%왕초
静态顶空%固相微萃取%元宝枫%挥发物
靜態頂空%固相微萃取%元寶楓%揮髮物
정태정공%고상미췌취%원보풍%휘발물
Static headspace (SHS)%solid-phase microextraction (SPME)%Acer truncatum Bunge%volatiles
采用带捕集肼的静态顶空与固相微萃取法分别测定元宝枫叶片挥发物成分,通过气相色谱-质谱联用仪定性和定量分析,对两种方法进行比较。结果表明,静态顶空检测的成分较少,固相微萃取法检测的成分较多,但均以酯类和萜烯类物质为主。两种方法共同检测出的成分有10种,分别为3-己烯醇、乙酸叶醇酯、乙酸己酯、2-己烯-1-醇乙酸酯、柠檬腈、丁酸-4-己烯酯、丁酸-3-己烯酯、丁酸己酯、β-石竹烯和α-石竹烯。两种方法检测到的挥发物的相对含量差异较大。通过比较来看,采用SPME法更适合元宝枫叶片挥发物的测定。
採用帶捕集肼的靜態頂空與固相微萃取法分彆測定元寶楓葉片揮髮物成分,通過氣相色譜-質譜聯用儀定性和定量分析,對兩種方法進行比較。結果錶明,靜態頂空檢測的成分較少,固相微萃取法檢測的成分較多,但均以酯類和萜烯類物質為主。兩種方法共同檢測齣的成分有10種,分彆為3-己烯醇、乙痠葉醇酯、乙痠己酯、2-己烯-1-醇乙痠酯、檸檬腈、丁痠-4-己烯酯、丁痠-3-己烯酯、丁痠己酯、β-石竹烯和α-石竹烯。兩種方法檢測到的揮髮物的相對含量差異較大。通過比較來看,採用SPME法更適閤元寶楓葉片揮髮物的測定。
채용대포집정적정태정공여고상미췌취법분별측정원보풍협편휘발물성분,통과기상색보-질보련용의정성화정량분석,대량충방법진행비교。결과표명,정태정공검측적성분교소,고상미췌취법검측적성분교다,단균이지류화첩희류물질위주。량충방법공동검측출적성분유10충,분별위3-기희순、을산협순지、을산기지、2-기희-1-순을산지、저몽정、정산-4-기희지、정산-3-기희지、정산기지、β-석죽희화α-석죽희。량충방법검측도적휘발물적상대함량차이교대。통과비교래간,채용SPME법경괄합원보풍협편휘발물적측정。
Volatiles from leaves of Acer truncatum Bunge were extracted by Static Headspace (SHS) and Solid-phase Microextraction (SPME) respectively. Their qualitative and quantitative analysis of volatiles was carried out by GC/MS. The results indicated that more compounds were identified by SPME, while that of SHS was fewer. 3-Hexen-1-ol, 3-Hexen-1-ol,acetate, Acetic acid hexyl ester, 2-Hexen-1-ol,acetate, Geranyl nitrile, Butanoic acid, 4-Hexenyl ester, Butanoic acid, 3-Hexenyl ester, Butanoic acid hexyl ester, β-Caryophyllene andα-Caryophyllene were identified by SHS and SPME simultaneously. The results showed that SPME was more suitable for the analysis of Volatiles from Leaves of Acer truncatum Bunge.