局解手术学杂志
跼解手術學雜誌
국해수술학잡지
JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY
2014年
6期
610-611,612
,共3页
王永恒%徐小宁%凌丰军%张端孟%黄冬玲%王岩峰%周洋%王秀丽
王永恆%徐小寧%凌豐軍%張耑孟%黃鼕玲%王巖峰%週洋%王秀麗
왕영항%서소저%릉봉군%장단맹%황동령%왕암봉%주양%왕수려
锁骨下静脉%穿刺置管术%临床观察%解剖学基础
鎖骨下靜脈%穿刺置管術%臨床觀察%解剖學基礎
쇄골하정맥%천자치관술%림상관찰%해부학기출
subclavian vein%catheterization%clinical observation%anatomic basis
目的:熟悉锁骨下静脉的局部解剖结构,熟练掌握SVC的操作方法和技能,提高穿刺成功率。方法回顾性分析我院2010年3月至2014年3月接受SVC的600例住院患者(男410例,女190例)的临床资料。结果成功穿刺582例,穿刺成功率为97%。其中1次穿刺成功546例(91%),重复穿刺或改颈内静脉或其它穿刺38例(6.3%),失败16例(2.7%)。发生并发症22例(3.7%),其中误入动脉8例(1.3%),气胸3例(0.5%),导管尖端导入颈内静脉5例(0.8%),导管相关感染2例(0.3%),导管堵塞2例(0.3%),心律失常2例(0.3%)。结论SVC简单易学,安全可靠,成功率高,并发症少,导管保留时间较长,是一种较好的中心静脉穿刺方法,值得在临床推广使用。
目的:熟悉鎖骨下靜脈的跼部解剖結構,熟練掌握SVC的操作方法和技能,提高穿刺成功率。方法迴顧性分析我院2010年3月至2014年3月接受SVC的600例住院患者(男410例,女190例)的臨床資料。結果成功穿刺582例,穿刺成功率為97%。其中1次穿刺成功546例(91%),重複穿刺或改頸內靜脈或其它穿刺38例(6.3%),失敗16例(2.7%)。髮生併髮癥22例(3.7%),其中誤入動脈8例(1.3%),氣胸3例(0.5%),導管尖耑導入頸內靜脈5例(0.8%),導管相關感染2例(0.3%),導管堵塞2例(0.3%),心律失常2例(0.3%)。結論SVC簡單易學,安全可靠,成功率高,併髮癥少,導管保留時間較長,是一種較好的中心靜脈穿刺方法,值得在臨床推廣使用。
목적:숙실쇄골하정맥적국부해부결구,숙련장악SVC적조작방법화기능,제고천자성공솔。방법회고성분석아원2010년3월지2014년3월접수SVC적600례주원환자(남410례,녀190례)적림상자료。결과성공천자582례,천자성공솔위97%。기중1차천자성공546례(91%),중복천자혹개경내정맥혹기타천자38례(6.3%),실패16례(2.7%)。발생병발증22례(3.7%),기중오입동맥8례(1.3%),기흉3례(0.5%),도관첨단도입경내정맥5례(0.8%),도관상관감염2례(0.3%),도관도새2례(0.3%),심률실상2례(0.3%)。결론SVC간단역학,안전가고,성공솔고,병발증소,도관보류시간교장,시일충교호적중심정맥천자방법,치득재림상추엄사용。
Objective To study the local anatomic structure of subclavian vein and have a good command of operating methods and skills on subclavian vein catheterization (SVC) so as to improve the success rate of puncture. Methods Retrospectively analyze the clinical data of 600 cases of hospitalized patients who have had SVC (male 410, female 190) in our hospital from March 2010 to March 2014. Results There were 582 cases (97%) of successful puncture,including 546 cases (91%) of one-time puncture success,38 cases (6. 3%) of repeated puncture or other types of puncture,and 16 cases (2. 7%) of failed puncture. Postoperative complications occurred in 22 patients (3. 7%),including 8 cases (1. 3%) of strayed into the artery,3 cases (0. 5%) of pneumothorax,5 cases (0. 8%) of catheter tip into the internal jugular vein,2 cases (0. 3%) of catheter related infection,2 cases (0. 3%) of catheter blockage,and 2 cases (0. 3%) of arrhythmia. Conclusion SVC is easy,safe and reliable,and it is of high success rate and less complications. Catheter retention time of SVC is longer. From the above,SVC is a good central venous puncture method which is worth of popularizing in clinical use.