承德医学院学报
承德醫學院學報
승덕의학원학보
JOURNAL OF CHENGDE MEDICAL
2014年
6期
463-465
,共3页
任桂玲%郭艳玲%董晓强%李沈明
任桂玲%郭豔玲%董曉彊%李瀋明
임계령%곽염령%동효강%리침명
金莲花口服液%质量控制%指纹图谱%荭草苷%牡荆素
金蓮花口服液%質量控製%指紋圖譜%葒草苷%牡荊素
금연화구복액%질량공제%지문도보%홍초감%모형소
Trollii Flos Oral Liquid (TFOL)%Quality control%Fingerprint%Orientin%Vitexin
目的::建立金莲花口服液有效的质量评价方法。方法:通过建立HPLC指纹图谱和检测金莲花口服液中有效成分荭草苷、牡荆素的含量,对市售金莲花口服液的质量进行分析。采用Phenomenex C18(4.6×250mm,5μm)色谱柱;乙腈-0.1%磷酸-0.1%四氢呋喃溶剂系统梯度洗脱;检测波长230nm;流速1.0ml/min。结果:确定了20个共有峰,市售金莲花口服液指纹图谱峰相似度均>0.94;荭草苷的线性范围:10.00-392.80μg/ml(r=0.9999),牡荆苷的线性范围:2.40-94.90μg/ml(r=0.9999);荭草苷平均回收率为101.85%,RSD为1.61%(n=6),牡荆苷平均回收率为102.53%,RSD为1.45%(n=6)。结论:本研究建立的金莲花口服液指纹图谱,以及荭草苷和牡荆素含量测定方法简便、准确、灵敏度高,稳定性和重现性良好,可为金莲花口服液的质量控制提供依据。
目的::建立金蓮花口服液有效的質量評價方法。方法:通過建立HPLC指紋圖譜和檢測金蓮花口服液中有效成分葒草苷、牡荊素的含量,對市售金蓮花口服液的質量進行分析。採用Phenomenex C18(4.6×250mm,5μm)色譜柱;乙腈-0.1%燐痠-0.1%四氫呋喃溶劑繫統梯度洗脫;檢測波長230nm;流速1.0ml/min。結果:確定瞭20箇共有峰,市售金蓮花口服液指紋圖譜峰相似度均>0.94;葒草苷的線性範圍:10.00-392.80μg/ml(r=0.9999),牡荊苷的線性範圍:2.40-94.90μg/ml(r=0.9999);葒草苷平均迴收率為101.85%,RSD為1.61%(n=6),牡荊苷平均迴收率為102.53%,RSD為1.45%(n=6)。結論:本研究建立的金蓮花口服液指紋圖譜,以及葒草苷和牡荊素含量測定方法簡便、準確、靈敏度高,穩定性和重現性良好,可為金蓮花口服液的質量控製提供依據。
목적::건립금연화구복액유효적질량평개방법。방법:통과건립HPLC지문도보화검측금연화구복액중유효성분홍초감、모형소적함량,대시수금연화구복액적질량진행분석。채용Phenomenex C18(4.6×250mm,5μm)색보주;을정-0.1%린산-0.1%사경부남용제계통제도세탈;검측파장230nm;류속1.0ml/min。결과:학정료20개공유봉,시수금연화구복액지문도보봉상사도균>0.94;홍초감적선성범위:10.00-392.80μg/ml(r=0.9999),모형감적선성범위:2.40-94.90μg/ml(r=0.9999);홍초감평균회수솔위101.85%,RSD위1.61%(n=6),모형감평균회수솔위102.53%,RSD위1.45%(n=6)。결론:본연구건립적금연화구복액지문도보,이급홍초감화모형소함량측정방법간편、준학、령민도고,은정성화중현성량호,가위금연화구복액적질량공제제공의거。
Objective: To establish effective quality evaluation methods ofTrollii FlosOral Liquid (TFOL).Methods:The quality of commercially available TFOL was analyzed by establishing ifngerprint by HPLC and determining the content of active ingredients, orientin and vitexin. Phenomenex C18column (4.6×250mm, 5μm) was used with mobile phase was acetonitrile-0.1% phosphoric acid-0.1% tetrahydrofuran, determine wavelength was 230nm, lfow velocity was 1.0ml/min. Results:This study determined 20 common peaks, and the similarity ifngerprint peaks of commercially available TFOL were all greater than 0.94. The linear range of orientin and vitexin were 10.00-392.80(r= 0.9999) and 2.40-94.90 μg/ml (r = 0.9999); the average recovery rate were 101.85% and 102.53%; the RSD were 1.61% (n=6) and 1.45% (n=6).Conclusions:The method in this study that establishing TFOL ifnger print and determination of orientin and vitexin is simple, accurate, high sensitive, and also with better stability and reproducibility. So this method can provide basis for quality control of TFOL.