中华围产医学杂志
中華圍產醫學雜誌
중화위산의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE
2014年
12期
809-812
,共4页
付杰%马京梅%于丽%潘虹%杨慧霞
付傑%馬京梅%于麗%潘虹%楊慧霞
부걸%마경매%우려%반홍%양혜하
染色体畸变%核型分析%产前诊断%羊水%羊膜腔穿刺术
染色體畸變%覈型分析%產前診斷%羊水%羊膜腔穿刺術
염색체기변%핵형분석%산전진단%양수%양막강천자술
Chromosome aberrations%Karyotyping%Prenatal diagnosis%Amniotic fluid%Amniocentesis
目的:探讨有不良孕产史的孕妇行胎儿染色体核型分析的临床意义。方法2005年1月4日至2013年12月31日,共1193例孕妇因不良孕产史在北京大学第一医院行羊膜腔穿刺羊水细胞胎儿染色体核型分析。根据既往不良孕产史病因,将其分为4组,分别是:生育过遗传代谢性疾病或单基因遗传性疾病患儿的孕妇273例(A组),孕育过染色体病患儿的孕妇81例(B组),夫妇一方为染色体异常携带者8例(C组),不良孕产史病因不详的孕妇833例(D组)。回顾分析这些孕妇胎儿染色体异常核型的分布特点。结果共发现胎儿染色体异常48例[4.0%(48/1193)],其中染色体多态性变异26例,染色体结构和数目异常22例,包括4例21-三体、4例性染色体异常、3例18-三体、3例额外小染色体、3例相互易位、1例罗伯逊易位、1例6号染色体臂间倒位、1例3号染色体臂间倒位、1例14-三体嵌合型、1例14号染色体结构异常。A组检出4例(1.5%)有临床意义的胎儿染色体核型异常及4例多态性变异;A组同时检出61例遗传代谢性疾病或单基因遗传性疾病胎儿及2例基因突变携带者,但均未合并染色体核型异常。B组检出2例(2.5%)胎儿染色体核型异常。C组检出2例(2/8)胎儿染色体相互易位,核型均与亲代相同。D组共检出3例21-三体、3例18-三体、2例性染色体异常、2例额外小染色体,均为高龄孕妇;还检出4例染色体结构异常及22例染色体多态性变异,夫妇均行外周血染色体检查,证实胎儿异常核型来自双亲之一。结论应根据不良孕产史的病因,选择合适的产前诊断方法。
目的:探討有不良孕產史的孕婦行胎兒染色體覈型分析的臨床意義。方法2005年1月4日至2013年12月31日,共1193例孕婦因不良孕產史在北京大學第一醫院行羊膜腔穿刺羊水細胞胎兒染色體覈型分析。根據既往不良孕產史病因,將其分為4組,分彆是:生育過遺傳代謝性疾病或單基因遺傳性疾病患兒的孕婦273例(A組),孕育過染色體病患兒的孕婦81例(B組),伕婦一方為染色體異常攜帶者8例(C組),不良孕產史病因不詳的孕婦833例(D組)。迴顧分析這些孕婦胎兒染色體異常覈型的分佈特點。結果共髮現胎兒染色體異常48例[4.0%(48/1193)],其中染色體多態性變異26例,染色體結構和數目異常22例,包括4例21-三體、4例性染色體異常、3例18-三體、3例額外小染色體、3例相互易位、1例囉伯遜易位、1例6號染色體臂間倒位、1例3號染色體臂間倒位、1例14-三體嵌閤型、1例14號染色體結構異常。A組檢齣4例(1.5%)有臨床意義的胎兒染色體覈型異常及4例多態性變異;A組同時檢齣61例遺傳代謝性疾病或單基因遺傳性疾病胎兒及2例基因突變攜帶者,但均未閤併染色體覈型異常。B組檢齣2例(2.5%)胎兒染色體覈型異常。C組檢齣2例(2/8)胎兒染色體相互易位,覈型均與親代相同。D組共檢齣3例21-三體、3例18-三體、2例性染色體異常、2例額外小染色體,均為高齡孕婦;還檢齣4例染色體結構異常及22例染色體多態性變異,伕婦均行外週血染色體檢查,證實胎兒異常覈型來自雙親之一。結論應根據不良孕產史的病因,選擇閤適的產前診斷方法。
목적:탐토유불량잉산사적잉부행태인염색체핵형분석적림상의의。방법2005년1월4일지2013년12월31일,공1193례잉부인불량잉산사재북경대학제일의원행양막강천자양수세포태인염색체핵형분석。근거기왕불량잉산사병인,장기분위4조,분별시:생육과유전대사성질병혹단기인유전성질병환인적잉부273례(A조),잉육과염색체병환인적잉부81례(B조),부부일방위염색체이상휴대자8례(C조),불량잉산사병인불상적잉부833례(D조)。회고분석저사잉부태인염색체이상핵형적분포특점。결과공발현태인염색체이상48례[4.0%(48/1193)],기중염색체다태성변이26례,염색체결구화수목이상22례,포괄4례21-삼체、4례성염색체이상、3례18-삼체、3례액외소염색체、3례상호역위、1례라백손역위、1례6호염색체비간도위、1례3호염색체비간도위、1례14-삼체감합형、1례14호염색체결구이상。A조검출4례(1.5%)유림상의의적태인염색체핵형이상급4례다태성변이;A조동시검출61례유전대사성질병혹단기인유전성질병태인급2례기인돌변휴대자,단균미합병염색체핵형이상。B조검출2례(2.5%)태인염색체핵형이상。C조검출2례(2/8)태인염색체상호역위,핵형균여친대상동。D조공검출3례21-삼체、3례18-삼체、2례성염색체이상、2례액외소염색체,균위고령잉부;환검출4례염색체결구이상급22례염색체다태성변이,부부균행외주혈염색체검사,증실태인이상핵형래자쌍친지일。결론응근거불량잉산사적병인,선택합괄적산전진단방법。
Objective To study the clinical significance of chromosome karyotyping in pregnant women with a history of abnormal pregnancy. Methods The fetal chromosome karyotypes of 1 193 pregnant women with a history of abnormal pregnancy in Peking University First Hospital from January 4, 2005 to December 31, 2013 were analyzed. According to the etiology of their previous abnormal pregnancy, these women were divided into four groups: 273 women had children with inherited metabolic disorders or single-gene genetic diseases (group A), 81 women had children or fetuses with chromosome abnormalities (group B), eight cases had an abnormal chromosomal karyotype in either husband or wife (group C), and 833 women had abnormal pregnancy of unknown causes(group D). Results Forty-eight [4.0%(48/1 193)] and fetuses were found to have abnormal chromosomal karyotypes, including 26 cases of chromosome polymorphism variations and 22 cases of numerical and structural abnormalities (four cases of trisomy 21, four cases of numerical sex chromosome abnormalities, three cases of trisomy 18, three cases of extra small chromosome mosaicism, three cases of reciprocal translocation, one case of Robertsonian translocation, one case of chromosome six inversion between the arms, one case of chromosome three inversion between the arms, one case of mosaicism of trisomy 14 and one case of structural abnormality of chromosome 14). In group A, four cases (1.5%) of chromosomal abnormalities of clinical significance and four cases of chromosome polymorphism variations were detected. Meanwhile, 61 fetuses with inherited metabolic disorders or single-gene genetic diseases and two cases of gene mutation carriers were detected in group A, but among whom, there were no abnormal chromosome karyotype cases. In group B, two cases (2.5%) of chromosomal abnormalities were found. In group C, two cases (2/8) of reciprocal translocation were found, whose karyotypes were the same as the parents. In group D, three cases of trisomy 21, three cases of trisomy 18, two cases of extra small chromosome mosaicism and two cases of numerical sex chromosome abnormalities were found. All the mothers in this group were of advanced age. Four cases of structural abnormalities and 22 cases of chromosome polymorphism variations were also found in this group, chromosomal analysis was subsequently performed in those couples, and found that the abnormal chromosomal karyotypes in the fetuses were the same as those in the parents. Conclusions Appropriate prenatal cell genetic diagnostic methods should be chosen according to the causes of abnormal pregnancy history.