中国急救医学
中國急救醫學
중국급구의학
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
2014年
12期
1061-1063,1064
,共4页
孟晓燕%黄向阳%谭鹤长%刘倩%王英
孟曉燕%黃嚮暘%譚鶴長%劉倩%王英
맹효연%황향양%담학장%류천%왕영
持续低效透析%连续性血液净化%血液灌流%炎症介质%脓毒症%急性肾损伤
持續低效透析%連續性血液淨化%血液灌流%炎癥介質%膿毒癥%急性腎損傷
지속저효투석%련속성혈액정화%혈액관류%염증개질%농독증%급성신손상
Sustained low-efficiency dialysis%Continuous blood purification%Hemoperfusion%Inflammatory mediators%Sepsis%Acute kidney injury
目的:比较持续低效血液透析( sustained low -efficiency dialysis , SLED)联合血液灌流(hemoperfusion, HP)与连续性血液净化(continuous blood purification, CBP)在脓毒症急性肾损伤( AKI)患者中的治疗效果。方法52例脓毒症AKI患者,根据行血液净化方式不同分为SLED联合HP组(n=25)及CBP组(n=27),比较两组治疗前后平均动脉压(MAP)、氧合指数(PaO2/FiO2,OI)、血肌酐(Scr)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)及急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ( acute physiology and chronic health evaluation , APACHEⅡ)评分、ICU住院时间及90 d死亡率等指标。结果两组治疗后第1、2、3、7天Scr、TNF-α、IL-6水平较治疗前均明显下降(P<0.05),第2、3、7天APACHEⅡ评分较治疗前明显下降(P<0.05),OI、MAP明显上升( P <0.05)。 SLED 联合 HP 组在治疗后第2、3、7天的 Scr、TNF -α、IL -6、APACHEⅡ评分均低于CBP组,OI及MAP均高于CBP组(P<0.05),ICU住院时间短于CBP组,但两组90 d死亡率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 SLED联合HP治疗脓毒症AKI在毒素及炎症介质清除方面优于CBP组,能缩短ICU住院时间,但90 d死亡率与CBP组比较差异无统计学意义,提示临床预后方面SLED联合HP治疗可能并不优于CBP组。
目的:比較持續低效血液透析( sustained low -efficiency dialysis , SLED)聯閤血液灌流(hemoperfusion, HP)與連續性血液淨化(continuous blood purification, CBP)在膿毒癥急性腎損傷( AKI)患者中的治療效果。方法52例膿毒癥AKI患者,根據行血液淨化方式不同分為SLED聯閤HP組(n=25)及CBP組(n=27),比較兩組治療前後平均動脈壓(MAP)、氧閤指數(PaO2/FiO2,OI)、血肌酐(Scr)、腫瘤壞死因子-α(TNF-α)、白細胞介素-6(IL-6)及急性生理學與慢性健康狀況評分繫統Ⅱ( acute physiology and chronic health evaluation , APACHEⅡ)評分、ICU住院時間及90 d死亡率等指標。結果兩組治療後第1、2、3、7天Scr、TNF-α、IL-6水平較治療前均明顯下降(P<0.05),第2、3、7天APACHEⅡ評分較治療前明顯下降(P<0.05),OI、MAP明顯上升( P <0.05)。 SLED 聯閤 HP 組在治療後第2、3、7天的 Scr、TNF -α、IL -6、APACHEⅡ評分均低于CBP組,OI及MAP均高于CBP組(P<0.05),ICU住院時間短于CBP組,但兩組90 d死亡率差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論 SLED聯閤HP治療膿毒癥AKI在毒素及炎癥介質清除方麵優于CBP組,能縮短ICU住院時間,但90 d死亡率與CBP組比較差異無統計學意義,提示臨床預後方麵SLED聯閤HP治療可能併不優于CBP組。
목적:비교지속저효혈액투석( sustained low -efficiency dialysis , SLED)연합혈액관류(hemoperfusion, HP)여련속성혈액정화(continuous blood purification, CBP)재농독증급성신손상( AKI)환자중적치료효과。방법52례농독증AKI환자,근거행혈액정화방식불동분위SLED연합HP조(n=25)급CBP조(n=27),비교량조치료전후평균동맥압(MAP)、양합지수(PaO2/FiO2,OI)、혈기항(Scr)、종류배사인자-α(TNF-α)、백세포개소-6(IL-6)급급성생이학여만성건강상황평분계통Ⅱ( acute physiology and chronic health evaluation , APACHEⅡ)평분、ICU주원시간급90 d사망솔등지표。결과량조치료후제1、2、3、7천Scr、TNF-α、IL-6수평교치료전균명현하강(P<0.05),제2、3、7천APACHEⅡ평분교치료전명현하강(P<0.05),OI、MAP명현상승( P <0.05)。 SLED 연합 HP 조재치료후제2、3、7천적 Scr、TNF -α、IL -6、APACHEⅡ평분균저우CBP조,OI급MAP균고우CBP조(P<0.05),ICU주원시간단우CBP조,단량조90 d사망솔차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론 SLED연합HP치료농독증AKI재독소급염증개질청제방면우우CBP조,능축단ICU주원시간,단90 d사망솔여CBP조비교차이무통계학의의,제시림상예후방면SLED연합HP치료가능병불우우CBP조。
Ob jective To compare the therapeutic effect between sustained low -efficiency dialysis (SLED) combined hemoperfusion (HP) and continuous blood purification (CBP) in patients with septic acute kidney injury ( AKI) .Methods Fifty-two patients during January 2010 and January 2013 with septic AKI were randomly assigned to receive SLED combined HP group ( n=25 ) and CBP group ( n =27 ) according to the different treatment ways . The mean arterial pressure ( MAP ) , oxygenation index (OI), serum creatinine (Scr), tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α), interleukin-6 ( IL-6) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ ( APACHEⅡ) score, ICU stay, 90-day mortality were compared before and after treatment of two groups .Results The levels of Scr , TNF-α, IL-6, APACHEⅡ score after treatment of 2, 3, 7 -day decreased significantly in SLED combined HP group compared with CBP group (P<0.05), but OI and MAP increased significantly (P<0.05).There were significant differences in ICU stay between two groups (P<0.05), but there were no significant differences in 90 -day mortality between two groups ( P>0.05 ) .Conclusion SLED combined HP treatment may be superior to CBP treatment in clearing toxins and inflammatory mediators, and can shorten the ICU stay , but may not be superior to CBP in improving clinical outcomes.