医院管理论坛
醫院管理論罈
의원관이론단
HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT FORUM
2014年
10期
39-41
,共3页
陈策%陈光东%土文珍%单建敏%叶加恩%黄子夜%陈基娜
陳策%陳光東%土文珍%單建敏%葉加恩%黃子夜%陳基娜
진책%진광동%토문진%단건민%협가은%황자야%진기나
抗抑郁药%抑郁症%成本-效果分析
抗抑鬱藥%抑鬱癥%成本-效果分析
항억욱약%억욱증%성본-효과분석
Antidepressant%Depression%Cost-effectiveness analysis
目的评价4种新型抗抑郁药物治疗抑郁症的成本-效果。方法将104例符合抑郁症首次发病的患者随机分为4组,分别给予度洛西汀胶囊、文拉法辛缓释胶囊、米氮平片、艾司西酞普兰片。疗效采用17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD17)。运用成本-效果法进行分析。结果4组有效率分别为73.08%、69.23%、69.23%、73.08%(P>0.05),成本分别为768.6元、562.8元、751.2元、751.8元,痊愈的成本-效果比为13.32、11.26、12.36、13.97;有效性的成本-效果比为10.51、8.13、8.25、10.28。结论文拉法辛缓释胶囊组治疗抑郁症成本-效果比更优。
目的評價4種新型抗抑鬱藥物治療抑鬱癥的成本-效果。方法將104例符閤抑鬱癥首次髮病的患者隨機分為4組,分彆給予度洛西汀膠囊、文拉法辛緩釋膠囊、米氮平片、艾司西酞普蘭片。療效採用17項漢密爾頓抑鬱量錶(HAMD17)。運用成本-效果法進行分析。結果4組有效率分彆為73.08%、69.23%、69.23%、73.08%(P>0.05),成本分彆為768.6元、562.8元、751.2元、751.8元,痊愈的成本-效果比為13.32、11.26、12.36、13.97;有效性的成本-效果比為10.51、8.13、8.25、10.28。結論文拉法辛緩釋膠囊組治療抑鬱癥成本-效果比更優。
목적평개4충신형항억욱약물치료억욱증적성본-효과。방법장104례부합억욱증수차발병적환자수궤분위4조,분별급여도락서정효낭、문랍법신완석효낭、미담평편、애사서태보란편。료효채용17항한밀이돈억욱량표(HAMD17)。운용성본-효과법진행분석。결과4조유효솔분별위73.08%、69.23%、69.23%、73.08%(P>0.05),성본분별위768.6원、562.8원、751.2원、751.8원,전유적성본-효과비위13.32、11.26、12.36、13.97;유효성적성본-효과비위10.51、8.13、8.25、10.28。결논문랍법신완석효낭조치료억욱증성본-효과비경우。
Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 4 new antidepressants for treatment of depression. Method 104 patients, who met the criteria of first-onset of depressive disorder, were randomly assigned into 4 groups and treated with duloxetine capsules, venlafaxine sustained-release capsules, mirtazapine tablets, escitalopram tablets respectively for 6 weeks. The Hamilton Depressive Scale (HAMD17) was adopted to assess efficacy and cost-effectiveness analysis was also applied. Results The efficient rate of four groups was 73.08%, 69.23%, 69.23%and 73.08%(P>0.05) respectively, and the costs were 768.6 Yuan, 562.8 Yuan, 751.2 Yuan and 751.8 Yuan. The cost-effectiveness ratio for healing was 13.32, 11.26, 12.36, and 13.97 and for efficacy was 10.51, 8.13, 8.25, and 10.28. Conclusion The regimen of venlafaxine sustained-release capsule is superior in terms of the cost-effectiveness ratios.