中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE AND BRAIN SCIENCE
2014年
11期
989-992
,共4页
于妍%杜启峰%张建龙%胡静%张文蔚%陈贻华%余金鸣%李水洪
于妍%杜啟峰%張建龍%鬍靜%張文蔚%陳貽華%餘金鳴%李水洪
우연%두계봉%장건룡%호정%장문위%진이화%여금명%리수홍
难治性抑郁症%临床特征%甲状腺激素
難治性抑鬱癥%臨床特徵%甲狀腺激素
난치성억욱증%림상특정%갑상선격소
Treatment-resistant depression%Clinical features%Thyroid hormone
目的:探讨难治性抑郁症的临床特征与血清甲状腺激素相关性。方法对43例难治性抑郁症患者和48例非难治性抑郁症患者采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表17项( HAMD17)和汉密尔顿焦虑量表( HAMA)进行评估,采用放射免疫法测定两组患者血清TSH、TT3、TT4、FT3、FT4水平;组间比较采用χ2检验、t检验;验证FT3与是否患TRD的关系:logistic回归分析中以FT3为自变量,是否患TRD为因变量,分析FT3的降低程度与发生TRD风险大小之间的量化关系;通过ROC曲线评价FT3在TRD中的诊断价值。结果难治性抑郁症组(TRD组)与非难治性抑郁症组(非TRD组)比较,起病年龄TRD组[(16.98±2.25)岁]比非TRD组[(23.50±3.38)岁]更早,受教育年限TRD组[(8.53±1.72)年]比非TRD组[(11.04±2.07)年]更短,总病程及本次发病病程TRD组[(10.14±6.47)年,(60.35±23.64)月]比非TRD组[(5.48±4.15)年,(5.00±3.40)月]更长,HAMD总分及其行为阻滞因子分TRD组[(19.09±1.59)分,(8.72±0.98)分]比非TRD组[(15.69±2.38)分,(4.98±1.63)分]更高,甲状腺激素中FT3值TRD组[(3.92±0.15)pmol/L]比非TRD组[(4.16±0.20)pmol/L]更低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 Logistic回归分析显示FT3每降低0.1 pmol/L,发生TRD的危险性上升1.006倍[ OR=2.006,95%CI =(1.501,2.681)]。 ROC曲线下面积为0.821(P<0.001),其95%置信区间为(0.734,0.907)。结论难治性抑郁症患者病程更长,起病更早,文化水平更低,HAMD总分更高,阻滞症状更重,血清FT3水平更低;FT3对诊断TRD有较高的参考价值。
目的:探討難治性抑鬱癥的臨床特徵與血清甲狀腺激素相關性。方法對43例難治性抑鬱癥患者和48例非難治性抑鬱癥患者採用漢密爾頓抑鬱量錶17項( HAMD17)和漢密爾頓焦慮量錶( HAMA)進行評估,採用放射免疫法測定兩組患者血清TSH、TT3、TT4、FT3、FT4水平;組間比較採用χ2檢驗、t檢驗;驗證FT3與是否患TRD的關繫:logistic迴歸分析中以FT3為自變量,是否患TRD為因變量,分析FT3的降低程度與髮生TRD風險大小之間的量化關繫;通過ROC麯線評價FT3在TRD中的診斷價值。結果難治性抑鬱癥組(TRD組)與非難治性抑鬱癥組(非TRD組)比較,起病年齡TRD組[(16.98±2.25)歲]比非TRD組[(23.50±3.38)歲]更早,受教育年限TRD組[(8.53±1.72)年]比非TRD組[(11.04±2.07)年]更短,總病程及本次髮病病程TRD組[(10.14±6.47)年,(60.35±23.64)月]比非TRD組[(5.48±4.15)年,(5.00±3.40)月]更長,HAMD總分及其行為阻滯因子分TRD組[(19.09±1.59)分,(8.72±0.98)分]比非TRD組[(15.69±2.38)分,(4.98±1.63)分]更高,甲狀腺激素中FT3值TRD組[(3.92±0.15)pmol/L]比非TRD組[(4.16±0.20)pmol/L]更低,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。 Logistic迴歸分析顯示FT3每降低0.1 pmol/L,髮生TRD的危險性上升1.006倍[ OR=2.006,95%CI =(1.501,2.681)]。 ROC麯線下麵積為0.821(P<0.001),其95%置信區間為(0.734,0.907)。結論難治性抑鬱癥患者病程更長,起病更早,文化水平更低,HAMD總分更高,阻滯癥狀更重,血清FT3水平更低;FT3對診斷TRD有較高的參攷價值。
목적:탐토난치성억욱증적림상특정여혈청갑상선격소상관성。방법대43례난치성억욱증환자화48례비난치성억욱증환자채용한밀이돈억욱량표17항( HAMD17)화한밀이돈초필량표( HAMA)진행평고,채용방사면역법측정량조환자혈청TSH、TT3、TT4、FT3、FT4수평;조간비교채용χ2검험、t검험;험증FT3여시부환TRD적관계:logistic회귀분석중이FT3위자변량,시부환TRD위인변량,분석FT3적강저정도여발생TRD풍험대소지간적양화관계;통과ROC곡선평개FT3재TRD중적진단개치。결과난치성억욱증조(TRD조)여비난치성억욱증조(비TRD조)비교,기병년령TRD조[(16.98±2.25)세]비비TRD조[(23.50±3.38)세]경조,수교육년한TRD조[(8.53±1.72)년]비비TRD조[(11.04±2.07)년]경단,총병정급본차발병병정TRD조[(10.14±6.47)년,(60.35±23.64)월]비비TRD조[(5.48±4.15)년,(5.00±3.40)월]경장,HAMD총분급기행위조체인자분TRD조[(19.09±1.59)분,(8.72±0.98)분]비비TRD조[(15.69±2.38)분,(4.98±1.63)분]경고,갑상선격소중FT3치TRD조[(3.92±0.15)pmol/L]비비TRD조[(4.16±0.20)pmol/L]경저,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。 Logistic회귀분석현시FT3매강저0.1 pmol/L,발생TRD적위험성상승1.006배[ OR=2.006,95%CI =(1.501,2.681)]。 ROC곡선하면적위0.821(P<0.001),기95%치신구간위(0.734,0.907)。결론난치성억욱증환자병정경장,기병경조,문화수평경저,HAMD총분경고,조체증상경중,혈청FT3수평경저;FT3대진단TRD유교고적삼고개치。
Objective To explore the clinical characteristics of treatment?resistant depression ( TRD) and of its relevance with thyroid hormones. Methods 43 patients with TRD and 48 patients with non?TRD were as?sessed with 17?item Hamilton depression scale ( HAMD?17) and Hamilton anxiety scale ( HAMA) . The serum lev?el of thyroid?stimulating hormone ( TSH) ,total triodothgronine ( TT3) ,total thyroxine ( TT4) ,free triodothgronine ( FT3) and free thyroxine ( FT4) were determined by radioimmunoassay. χ2 test and t test were used for statistic a?nalysis. The quantitative relation of FT3 level with TRD was analyzed and the value of FT3 level in TRD diagnosis was evaluated by ROC curve.Results Compared with non?TRD patients,the TRD patients showed a younger dis?ease onset age ((16.98±2.25)years vs (23.50±3.38)years) and a longer disease course ((10.14±6.47)years vs (5.48±4.15)years) for total disease course;(60.35±23.64)months vs (5.00±3.40)months for current disease course),and had shorter education years ((8.53±1.72)years vs (11.04±2.07)years) and higher HAMD total scores (19.09±1.59 vs 15.69±2.38) and behavior retarding factor scores (8.72±0.98 vs 4.98±1.63). In addition, the FT3 level of TRD patients was lower than that of non?TRD patients ((3.92±0.15)pmol/L vs (4.16±0.20) pmol/L).All the above differences between two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). The logistic regres?sion analysis showed that the risk of suffering TRD increased by 1. 006?fold when FT3 level reduced 0. 1 pmol/L (OR=2.006,95%CI=(1.501,2.681). The area under ROC curve was 0.821 (P<0.001) with its 95% confidence interval of (0.734,0.907). Conclusion Compared with non?TRD patients,TRD patients have a longer disease course,a younger disease onset age, a lower education level, higher HAMD total scores, more severe retardation symptoms,and a lower FT3 level. The serum FT3 level has a high reference value in diagnosis of TRD.