江苏实用心电学杂志
江囌實用心電學雜誌
강소실용심전학잡지
JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL ELECTROCARDIOLOGYJS
2014年
6期
417-420
,共4页
陶艾彬%真亚%郭俊芳%鲍中华
陶艾彬%真亞%郭俊芳%鮑中華
도애빈%진아%곽준방%포중화
肺静脉电隔离术%碎裂电位%持续性房颤%疗效
肺靜脈電隔離術%碎裂電位%持續性房顫%療效
폐정맥전격리술%쇄렬전위%지속성방전%료효
pulmonary vein isolation%complex fractionated atrial electrograms%persistent atrial fibrillation%curative effect
目的:观察肺静脉电隔离术( pulmonary vein isolation , PVI )联合碎裂电位( complex fractionated atrial electrograms , CFAE)消融对持续性房颤的疗效。方法对比观察23名于本院行房颤射频消融术的持续性房颤患者,所有患者均行PVI及左房顶部线性消融,其中12例联合CFAE消融,术后随访1年;观察两组手术时间、X线曝光时间、消融时间、手术并发症、左房大小、左房血栓、一次手术成功率等指标。结果联合CFAE消融组总手术时间(252±35) min、X线曝光时间(42±9.1)min、消融时间(94±11)min,单纯行PVI 组分别为(176±22)min、(34±7.6)min、(63±8)min,联合CFAE消融组手术各时间均明显延长(P<0.01);两组手术并发症、对左房大小及左房血栓的影响比较差异均无统计学意义;联合CFAE消融组一次手术成功率(75%)明显高于单纯行PVI组(64%)( P<0.05)。结论 PVI联合CFAE消融治疗持续性房颤虽增加手术、消融及X线曝光时间,但并不会提高并发症发生率,可提高房颤消融的一次手术成功率。
目的:觀察肺靜脈電隔離術( pulmonary vein isolation , PVI )聯閤碎裂電位( complex fractionated atrial electrograms , CFAE)消融對持續性房顫的療效。方法對比觀察23名于本院行房顫射頻消融術的持續性房顫患者,所有患者均行PVI及左房頂部線性消融,其中12例聯閤CFAE消融,術後隨訪1年;觀察兩組手術時間、X線曝光時間、消融時間、手術併髮癥、左房大小、左房血栓、一次手術成功率等指標。結果聯閤CFAE消融組總手術時間(252±35) min、X線曝光時間(42±9.1)min、消融時間(94±11)min,單純行PVI 組分彆為(176±22)min、(34±7.6)min、(63±8)min,聯閤CFAE消融組手術各時間均明顯延長(P<0.01);兩組手術併髮癥、對左房大小及左房血栓的影響比較差異均無統計學意義;聯閤CFAE消融組一次手術成功率(75%)明顯高于單純行PVI組(64%)( P<0.05)。結論 PVI聯閤CFAE消融治療持續性房顫雖增加手術、消融及X線曝光時間,但併不會提高併髮癥髮生率,可提高房顫消融的一次手術成功率。
목적:관찰폐정맥전격리술( pulmonary vein isolation , PVI )연합쇄렬전위( complex fractionated atrial electrograms , CFAE)소융대지속성방전적료효。방법대비관찰23명우본원행방전사빈소융술적지속성방전환자,소유환자균행PVI급좌방정부선성소융,기중12례연합CFAE소융,술후수방1년;관찰량조수술시간、X선폭광시간、소융시간、수술병발증、좌방대소、좌방혈전、일차수술성공솔등지표。결과연합CFAE소융조총수술시간(252±35) min、X선폭광시간(42±9.1)min、소융시간(94±11)min,단순행PVI 조분별위(176±22)min、(34±7.6)min、(63±8)min,연합CFAE소융조수술각시간균명현연장(P<0.01);량조수술병발증、대좌방대소급좌방혈전적영향비교차이균무통계학의의;연합CFAE소융조일차수술성공솔(75%)명현고우단순행PVI조(64%)( P<0.05)。결론 PVI연합CFAE소융치료지속성방전수증가수술、소융급X선폭광시간,단병불회제고병발증발생솔,가제고방전소융적일차수술성공솔。
Objective To observe the effects of pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI) associated with complex fractionated atrial electrograms ( CFAE) ablation on patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF) .Methods Twenty-three patients with persistent AF were enrolled in the study .All of them had been treated by PVI and linear ablation in left atrium , among whom 12 cases were additionally given CFAE ablation .During a one-year follow-up, several indexes were compared between the two groups , including the duration of operation , X-ray exposure time , ablation time , surgical complica-tions, internal diameter and thrombus of left atrium , success rate of once operation , etc.Results Compared with PVI group, the total time of operation [(176 ±22) min vs.(252 ±35) min], X-ray exposure time[(34 ±7.6) min vs.(42 ±9.1) min], and ablation time[(63 ±8) min vs.(94 ± 11) min] was significantly increased in PVI +CFAE group ( P<0 .05 ) .The differences of surgical complications, and the influences on internal diameter and thrombus of left atrium were not statisti-cally significant .The success rate of once operation in PVI associated with CFAE ablation group was significantly higher than that in PVI group (75%vs.64%;P<0.05).Conclusion In the treat-ment of persistent atrial fibrillation , although PVI associated with CFAE ablation lengthens the time of operation , X-ray exposure time , and ablation time , it will not increase the incidence of complica-tions and can elevate the success rate of once operation in atrial fibrillation ablation .