国际护理学杂志
國際護理學雜誌
국제호이학잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING
2014年
11期
3187-3190
,共4页
王凌珊%郭丽娟%韩向北%杨东
王凌珊%郭麗娟%韓嚮北%楊東
왕릉산%곽려연%한향북%양동
心理干预%生物治疗%卵巢癌%负性情绪
心理榦預%生物治療%卵巢癌%負性情緒
심리간예%생물치료%란소암%부성정서
Ovarian cancer%Biotherapy%Negative emotion
目的:探讨持续心理干预对卵巢癌生物治疗患者负性情绪及生存质量的影响。方法选取住院治疗的卵巢癌患者80例,随机分为对照组和干预组,每组40例。对照组患者采用生物治疗前后的常规护理,干预组患者在常规护理的基础上实施心理干预。比较两组患者1个月后的心理状况和生活质量。结果治疗后干预组患者HAMA、HAMD得分均明显低于对照组(均P<0.05),患者总体健康状况、情感功能、认知功能得分均明显高于对照组(均P<0.05),疲劳、食欲、失眠得分均低于对照组(均P<0.05),两组患者躯体功能、角色功能、社会功能、疼痛、呼吸困难、恶心呕吐、便秘、腹泻、经济困难得分差异无统计学意义。结论持续心理干预可以改善卵巢癌患者负性情绪,提高生活质量。
目的:探討持續心理榦預對卵巢癌生物治療患者負性情緒及生存質量的影響。方法選取住院治療的卵巢癌患者80例,隨機分為對照組和榦預組,每組40例。對照組患者採用生物治療前後的常規護理,榦預組患者在常規護理的基礎上實施心理榦預。比較兩組患者1箇月後的心理狀況和生活質量。結果治療後榦預組患者HAMA、HAMD得分均明顯低于對照組(均P<0.05),患者總體健康狀況、情感功能、認知功能得分均明顯高于對照組(均P<0.05),疲勞、食欲、失眠得分均低于對照組(均P<0.05),兩組患者軀體功能、角色功能、社會功能、疼痛、呼吸睏難、噁心嘔吐、便祕、腹瀉、經濟睏難得分差異無統計學意義。結論持續心理榦預可以改善卵巢癌患者負性情緒,提高生活質量。
목적:탐토지속심리간예대란소암생물치료환자부성정서급생존질량적영향。방법선취주원치료적란소암환자80례,수궤분위대조조화간예조,매조40례。대조조환자채용생물치료전후적상규호리,간예조환자재상규호리적기출상실시심리간예。비교량조환자1개월후적심리상황화생활질량。결과치료후간예조환자HAMA、HAMD득분균명현저우대조조(균P<0.05),환자총체건강상황、정감공능、인지공능득분균명현고우대조조(균P<0.05),피로、식욕、실면득분균저우대조조(균P<0.05),량조환자구체공능、각색공능、사회공능、동통、호흡곤난、악심구토、편비、복사、경제곤난득분차이무통계학의의。결론지속심리간예가이개선란소암환자부성정서,제고생활질량。
Objective To explore the effect of continuous psychological intervention on negative emotions and quality of life to pa -tients with ovarian cancer during biotherapy.Methods A total of 80 patients with ovarian cancer were randomly divided into tow groups , the control group was given biotherapy and routine nursing , and the intervention group was given psychological intervention in addition to biother -apy and routine nursing.Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire -30 ( QLQ-C30 ) were used to measure the psychosomatic reaction and quality of life of ovarian cancer patients during biotherapy before and after intervention .Results After intervention , the scores of HAMA and HAMD in the intervention group were significantly lower than those in control group (P<0.05), scores for general quality of life and emo-tional function were higher , while scores for fatigue , insomnia and loss of appetite were lower in intervention group than those in control group with statistically significant differences (P<0.05) Conclusions Continuous psychological intervention can improve the state of negative emotions and quality of life .