中国实用医药
中國實用醫藥
중국실용의약
CHINA PRACTICAL MEDICAL
2014年
36期
37-38
,共2页
金雄伟%张浩%张云生%梁江%李满志
金雄偉%張浩%張雲生%樑江%李滿誌
금웅위%장호%장운생%량강%리만지
吻合技术%腹腔镜%低位直肠癌保肛手术%应用分析
吻閤技術%腹腔鏡%低位直腸癌保肛手術%應用分析
문합기술%복강경%저위직장암보항수술%응용분석
Anastomosis%Laparoscope%Low rectal cancer anus preservation operation%Application analysis
目的:分析不同吻合技术在腹腔镜低位直肠癌保肛手术中的临床应用效果。方法对90例行低位直肠癌保肛手术患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。90例患者均在腹腔镜下采用不同吻合技术进行低位直肠癌保肛手术,其中30例患者采用双吻合器技术为A组,30例患者使用人工吻合技术为B组,30例患者采用肛门脱出技术为C组,对比三组患者的临床效果。结果90例患者经过手术后均无需转入开腹术,各组手术指标中,除术中出血量存在差异外,其他指标均无明显差异,A组患者术后并发症发生率(10.00%)明显低于B组(33.33%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论双吻合器技术在腹腔镜低位直肠癌保肛手术中的应用效果较好,而掌握不同的吻合技术可以提高腹腔镜低位直肠癌保肛手术的保肛率,因此,应该根据患者实际病情选择适合的吻合技术。
目的:分析不同吻閤技術在腹腔鏡低位直腸癌保肛手術中的臨床應用效果。方法對90例行低位直腸癌保肛手術患者的臨床資料進行迴顧性分析。90例患者均在腹腔鏡下採用不同吻閤技術進行低位直腸癌保肛手術,其中30例患者採用雙吻閤器技術為A組,30例患者使用人工吻閤技術為B組,30例患者採用肛門脫齣技術為C組,對比三組患者的臨床效果。結果90例患者經過手術後均無需轉入開腹術,各組手術指標中,除術中齣血量存在差異外,其他指標均無明顯差異,A組患者術後併髮癥髮生率(10.00%)明顯低于B組(33.33%),差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論雙吻閤器技術在腹腔鏡低位直腸癌保肛手術中的應用效果較好,而掌握不同的吻閤技術可以提高腹腔鏡低位直腸癌保肛手術的保肛率,因此,應該根據患者實際病情選擇適閤的吻閤技術。
목적:분석불동문합기술재복강경저위직장암보항수술중적림상응용효과。방법대90례행저위직장암보항수술환자적림상자료진행회고성분석。90례환자균재복강경하채용불동문합기술진행저위직장암보항수술,기중30례환자채용쌍문합기기술위A조,30례환자사용인공문합기술위B조,30례환자채용항문탈출기술위C조,대비삼조환자적림상효과。결과90례환자경과수술후균무수전입개복술,각조수술지표중,제술중출혈량존재차이외,기타지표균무명현차이,A조환자술후병발증발생솔(10.00%)명현저우B조(33.33%),차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론쌍문합기기술재복강경저위직장암보항수술중적응용효과교호,이장악불동적문합기술가이제고복강경저위직장암보항수술적보항솔,인차,응해근거환자실제병정선택괄합적문합기술。
Objective To analyze the clinical application effects of different anastomosis in laparoscopic low rectal cancer anus preservation operation. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 90 patients, who underwent low rectal cancer anus preservation operation. The operations were performed under laparoscope through different anastomosis methods. Group A contained 30 cases receiving double stapling technique, group B contained 30 cases receiving artificial anastomosis, and group C contained 30 cases receiving anal emergence technology. The clinical effects of the three groups were compared. Results All the 90 cases had no need for laparotomy after operation. There were no obvious differences of operation indexes, except for intraoperative bleeding volume. The incidence of complications of group A (10.00%) was obviously lower than group B (33.33%), and the difference had statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion Different anastomosis methods can improve the anus preservation rate in laparoscopic low rectal cancer anus preservation operation. Meanwhile, digestive tract anastomosis is the difficulty in this operation.