CAJ | 학술논문

运用CNKI学术不端检测系统对《华南地震》2012年5月至2014年5月的318篇来稿进行检测，对文字复制比、作者单位、基金论文比进行分析。结果表明，地学论文中，文字复制比的数值高低与作者单位及是否基金项目支持无必然的联系，地学研究多有继承性和关联性，易出现文字重合，期刊编辑应从论文的创新性和实用性等多方面来进行判断。
운용CNKI학술불단검측계통대《화남지진》2012년5월지2014년5월적318편래고진행검측，대문자복제비、작자단위、기금논문비진행분석。결과표명，지학논문중，문자복제비적수치고저여작자단위급시부기금항목지지무필연적련계，지학연구다유계승성화관련성，역출현문자중합，기간편집응종논문적창신성화실용성등다방면래진행판단。
318 manuscripts in South China Journal of Seismology from May 2012 to May 2014 are detected by using CNKI academic misconduct detection system .The copy text ratios ,author’s institutions and the ratios of funded papers are analyzed .The results show that for papers on geosciences there is no certain connection between copy text ratio ,author’s institution and support by fund or not .Succession and association mostly exist in geosciences research and the related papers are prone to text coincidence .A paper should be judged from its creativities and usefulness etc .