CAJ | 학술논문

目的：观察辨经取穴与导气针法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效。方法采用随机数字表将549例腰椎间盘突出症患者随机分为两组，治疗组280例采用辨经取穴结合导气针法，对照组269例则采用辨经取穴结合电针疗法。结果治疗组总有效率为87.5%，对照组总有效率为86.6%，两组比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)；治疗组治愈率为51.8%，对照组治愈率为41.6%，两组比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论辨经取穴与导气针法治疗腰椎间盘突出症总有效率等同于辨经取穴结合电针疗法，而治愈率则优于后者。
목적：관찰변경취혈여도기침법치료요추간반돌출증적료효。방법채용수궤수자표장549례요추간반돌출증환자수궤분위량조，치료조280례채용변경취혈결합도기침법，대조조269례칙채용변경취혈결합전침요법。결과치료조총유효솔위87.5%，대조조총유효솔위86.6%，량조비교차이무통계학의의(P＞0.05)；치료조치유솔위51.8%，대조조치유솔위41.6%，량조비교차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05)。결론변경취혈여도기침법치료요추간반돌출증총유효솔등동우변경취혈결합전침요법，이치유솔칙우우후자。
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of meridian differentiation-based point selection plus qi-guiding acupuncture in treating lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.MethodFive hundred and forty-nine patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation were randomly allocated, using a random number table, to two groups. The treatment group of 280 patients received qi-guiding acupuncture at points selected according to meridian differentiation and the control group, electroacupuncture at points selected according to meridian differentiation.ResultThe total efficacy rate was 87.5% in the treatment group and 86.6% in the control group; there was no statistically significantdifference between the two groups (P>0.05). The cure rate was 51.8% in the treatment group and41.6% in the control group; there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). ConclusionThe total efficacy rate of qi-guiding acupuncture at points selected according to meridian differentiation for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation is similar to that of electroacupuncture at points selected according to meridian differentiation, but the cure rate of the former is higher thanthat of the latter.