中南大学学报(社会科学版)
中南大學學報(社會科學版)
중남대학학보(사회과학판)
JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCE)
2014年
6期
260-265
,共6页
后经典叙事学%语言%话语%话语转向%文本结构%社会文化语境%文论转型
後經典敘事學%語言%話語%話語轉嚮%文本結構%社會文化語境%文論轉型
후경전서사학%어언%화어%화어전향%문본결구%사회문화어경%문론전형
postclassical narratology%language%discourse%discourse transformation%text structure%social and cultural context%trans formation of culture
“话语转向”作为文学理论从“现代”向“后现代”过渡中最重要的范式转换之一,在将文学置于开放性的外在向度的同时,也在一定程度上失落了对于文本结构本身的关注。作为伴随“话语转向”而兴起的一种新的学科架构与知识体系,后经典叙事学一方面将人们的视域延伸至更宽广的社会文化语境,一方面也不忘立足文本,对文本自身各要素的复杂关系加以审慎的梳理与细致的辨析,并为研究者提供了一系列切实而具体的文本解读方式。后经典叙事理论不仅矫正了当前文学研究对于文本本身的相对忽视,同时也缓和了文论转型中“语言”和“话语”两阶段之间的张力,从而在“话语转向”的总体背景下展现出了充分的生长可能。
“話語轉嚮”作為文學理論從“現代”嚮“後現代”過渡中最重要的範式轉換之一,在將文學置于開放性的外在嚮度的同時,也在一定程度上失落瞭對于文本結構本身的關註。作為伴隨“話語轉嚮”而興起的一種新的學科架構與知識體繫,後經典敘事學一方麵將人們的視域延伸至更寬廣的社會文化語境,一方麵也不忘立足文本,對文本自身各要素的複雜關繫加以審慎的梳理與細緻的辨析,併為研究者提供瞭一繫列切實而具體的文本解讀方式。後經典敘事理論不僅矯正瞭噹前文學研究對于文本本身的相對忽視,同時也緩和瞭文論轉型中“語言”和“話語”兩階段之間的張力,從而在“話語轉嚮”的總體揹景下展現齣瞭充分的生長可能。
“화어전향”작위문학이론종“현대”향“후현대”과도중최중요적범식전환지일,재장문학치우개방성적외재향도적동시,야재일정정도상실락료대우문본결구본신적관주。작위반수“화어전향”이흥기적일충신적학과가구여지식체계,후경전서사학일방면장인문적시역연신지경관엄적사회문화어경,일방면야불망립족문본,대문본자신각요소적복잡관계가이심신적소리여세치적변석,병위연구자제공료일계렬절실이구체적문본해독방식。후경전서사이론불부교정료당전문학연구대우문본본신적상대홀시,동시야완화료문론전형중“어언”화“화어”량계단지간적장력,종이재“화어전향”적총체배경하전현출료충분적생장가능。
“Discursive turn” is one of the most important transformations in the movement from “modern” to“postmodern” in literary theory. Placing literature into the open and external dimension of theoretical research, to a certain extent, discursive turn overlooks the texture and structure of the text. “Postclassical narratology” is a new disciplinary structure and knowledge system which emerged with the tendency of “discursive turn”. On the one hand,“postclassical narratology” extends people’ horizons to the broader dimension of society and culture. On the other hand, it mostly focuses on the complex relationships among elements of literary work, and provides a series of practical critical mode to researchers. Postclassical narratology not only corrects the contemporary prejudice of neglecting the text itself, but also eases the tension between “language” and “discourse” in the transformation of literary theory. In conclusion, postclassical narratology unfolds sufficient space of development under the general background of “discursive turn”.