CAJ | 학술논문

针对平面微弹簧性能比较方法的缺乏，提出了弹簧柔度性能比较系数，通过在相等的弹簧占用结构面积情况下，分析C型、S型以及W型弹簧中任意两种弹簧柔度系数比的对数值分布情况。利用仿真软件验证了公式正确性，分析表明弹簧柔度性能比较系数理论值与仿真值相对误差小于5%。分析表明在S型弹簧与C型弹簧柔度性能比较系数以及C型弹簧与W型弹簧柔度性能比较系数为零情况下，弯梁夹角和弯半径与直粱(弯梁等效直粱长度)比值无关；在S型弹簧与C型弹簧柔度性能比较系数为零情况下，随夹角增大，弯半径与直粱比值先增大后减小。弯半径与直粱比值大小影响C型、S型、W型弹簧单位结构面积柔度系数顺序排列。
침대평면미탄황성능비교방법적결핍，제출료탄황유도성능비교계수，통과재상등적탄황점용결구면적정황하，분석C형、S형이급W형탄황중임의량충탄황유도계수비적대수치분포정황。이용방진연건험증료공식정학성，분석표명탄황유도성능비교계수이론치여방진치상대오차소우5%。분석표명재S형탄황여C형탄황유도성능비교계수이급C형탄황여W형탄황유도성능비교계수위령정황하，만량협각화만반경여직량(만량등효직량장도)비치무관；재S형탄황여C형탄황유도성능비교계수위령정황하，수협각증대，만반경여직량비치선증대후감소。만반경여직량비치대소영향C형、S형、W형탄황단위결구면적유도계수순서배렬。
Due to lack of performance comparison method for planar micro spring, this paper proposes the performance comparison coefficient of the spring. Based on spring occupying equal area of structure, the compliance ratio logarithm distribution of any two of C-shaped, S-shaped, and W-shaped springs is analyzed. By use of the simulation software, the correctness of the formulas is veri-fied. The analytic result that its theoretical value and simulation value are less than 5% for the spring coefficient of compliance per-formance comparison. When the comparison coefficients of S-shaped and C-shaped spring and the C-shaped and W-shaped spring are zero, the angle of bending beam is irrelevant to the ratio of bend radius and straight beam ( bending beam length is equivalent to straight beam) . When the comparison coefficient of S-shaped and C-shaped spring is zero, the ratio of bend radius and straight beam increases initial y and then decreases along with the angle increasing. The ratio of bend radius and straight beam affects the sequence of the compliance of C-shaped, S-shaped, and W-shaped spring.