CAJ | 학술논문

中国知识产权禁令制度由于缺乏类型化思考和体系化构建，目前存在禁令概念表述不严谨、禁令类型缺失、禁令性质定位模糊、立法体系混乱、审查标准和程序规则不完善等一系列问题。从类型化视角重构中国知识产权禁令制度，科学划分知识产权禁令的类型，合理定位知识产权禁令制度的性质，选择“民事诉讼法+侵权责任法+知识产权单行法+司法解释”的四元层级立法模式，明确不同类型知识产权禁令的实体审查标准和程序适用规则，将推进这一制度在中国现行法律体系内不断发展完善。
중국지식산권금령제도유우결핍류형화사고화체계화구건，목전존재금령개념표술불엄근、금령류형결실、금령성질정위모호、입법체계혼란、심사표준화정서규칙불완선등일계렬문제。종류형화시각중구중국지식산권금령제도，과학화분지식산권금령적류형，합리정위지식산권금령제도적성질，선택“민사소송법+침권책임법+지식산권단행법+사법해석”적사원층급입법모식，명학불동류형지식산권금령적실체심사표준화정서괄용규칙，장추진저일제도재중국현행법률체계내불단발전완선。
A series of problems have been in existence in China’s intellectual property injunction system for the lack of typed thinking and systematic building. For instance, the conceptual expression of injunction is not rigorous; some types of injunction are missing and its nature is unclear; the legislation system is chaotic; hypostatic review standards and procedure rules are not perfect, etc. Reconstructing China intellectual property injunction system from a typisierung perspective is beneficial to progressively perfect the intellectual property injunction system within the current legal structure. China should categorize the intellectual property injunction, properly position the nature selection of the legislative mode of four level which combine civil procedure law, tort liability law, intellectual property law and judicial interpretation as well as clear the entitative examination standards and the rules of procedure.