CAJ | 학술논문

选取Science Citation Index-expanded数据库中的中国的和印度的国际合作论文为样本，以零被引率为指标，比较分析了中国的和印度的国际合作论文历时变化、学科特征和合作关系规律。发现中国国际合作论文的零被引率略高于印度；在学科层面上，中印两国各有一半左右学科的零被引率高于对方；在合作关系上，中国的零被引率较高，且两国具有相同的特征：合作国家愈多，零被引率愈低。国际合作关系结构和国际合作论文质量是导致差异的两个原因。
선취Science Citation Index-expanded수거고중적중국적화인도적국제합작논문위양본，이령피인솔위지표，비교분석료중국적화인도적국제합작논문력시변화、학과특정화합작관계규률。발현중국국제합작논문적령피인솔략고우인도；재학과층면상，중인량국각유일반좌우학과적령피인솔고우대방；재합작관계상，중국적령피인솔교고，차량국구유상동적특정：합작국가유다，령피인솔유저。국제합작관계결구화국제합작논문질량시도치차이적량개원인。
Based on international coauthored papers in SCI-E in China and India, from their duration curve, subject characteristics, and international co-authorship status, we compared the percentage of never-cited of international collaborative papers and found that:the data with Chinese international papers is a bit higher than the Indian ones;at the subject level, China have a higher percentage than India in al-most half of its all subjects and vice versa.;the percentage of the never-cited international coauthored papers in China is higher than in In-dia in terms of the international co-authorship, and the two countries share an identical feature in that the more the cooperation countries, the lower the percentage of never-cited. International partnership structure and quality of the international coauthored papers are the two reasons leading to the differences between China and India.