CAJ | 학술논문

现有学术评价方法体系存在着许多的不足之处一直被人们所诟病，如，同行评议的主观性、引文评价的自引、马太效应、引用偏见、引用曲解等等。从社会网络的视角，基于合著网络的中心度指标提出了一种新的学术人才评价方法，这种方法一定程度上弥补了传统评价方法的不足，为学术人才评价方法体系提供了新的视角。最后，我们提出了该方法的不足之处和改善方向，将基于合著网络的学术人才评价方法与传统的发文、引文评价方法结合起来，可以得到更为全面和客观的评价结果。
현유학술평개방법체계존재착허다적불족지처일직피인문소후병，여，동행평의적주관성、인문평개적자인、마태효응、인용편견、인용곡해등등。종사회망락적시각，기우합저망락적중심도지표제출료일충신적학술인재평개방법，저충방법일정정도상미보료전통평개방법적불족，위학술인재평개방법체계제공료신적시각。최후，아문제출료해방법적불족지처화개선방향，장기우합저망락적학술인재평개방법여전통적발문、인문평개방법결합기래，가이득도경위전면화객관적평개결과。
In order to make up the disadvantages of existing measures of scholar evaluation, for instance, subjectivity of peer view and self-citation, Matthew effect, citation bias, citing distortion etc in citation analysis, this paper presents a new method to scholars’ impact e-valuation from social network perspective based on the centrality index and co-author network. Finally, the deficiencies and improvements of the method are proposed. Evaluating scholars by peer review, papers productivity, citation analysis, co-network analysis, and other va-rious methods together will get more comprehensive and objective result.