晋中学院学报
晉中學院學報
진중학원학보
JOURNAL OF JINZHONG UNIVERSITY
2014年
6期
101-104
,共4页
《人物志》%“都官考课”%刘卲
《人物誌》%“都官攷課”%劉卲
《인물지》%“도관고과”%류소
who’s who%examination method for Royal Officials%Liu Shao
《人物志》的撰写与“都官考课”的制定,是刘卲一生的两大创造。“都官考课”的制定,是以理想中的汉代察举制度为蓝本的;而《人物志》所反映出的却是一种带有名士趣味的观人法则。两者旨趣的背反,与汉魏之际急剧变动的时代风气息息相关。
《人物誌》的撰寫與“都官攷課”的製定,是劉卲一生的兩大創造。“都官攷課”的製定,是以理想中的漢代察舉製度為藍本的;而《人物誌》所反映齣的卻是一種帶有名士趣味的觀人法則。兩者旨趣的揹反,與漢魏之際急劇變動的時代風氣息息相關。
《인물지》적찬사여“도관고과”적제정,시류소일생적량대창조。“도관고과”적제정,시이이상중적한대찰거제도위람본적;이《인물지》소반영출적각시일충대유명사취미적관인법칙。량자지취적배반,여한위지제급극변동적시대풍기식식상관。
who’s who and Examination Method for Royal Officials (“Du guan kaoke”) are two big achievements by Liu Shao. The relationship between those two, however, lacks detailed analysis. This article puts forward that the enactment of Examination Method for Royal Officials takes the election system in Han Dynasty as the chief source, while who’s who shows the rule to observe people, which features the interesting way by persons of literary reputation. The difference in objective is closely linked to the social mores--dramatic changes in the Han and Wei Dynasties.