中华胃肠外科杂志
中華胃腸外科雜誌
중화위장외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
2014年
12期
1220-1222
,共3页
高明%陈青山%龚瑾%劳学军%唐家慧%王存川
高明%陳青山%龔瑾%勞學軍%唐傢慧%王存川
고명%진청산%공근%로학군%당가혜%왕존천
急性阑尾炎%早期诊断%按压疼痛加剧试验%呼吸疼痛试验
急性闌尾炎%早期診斷%按壓疼痛加劇試驗%呼吸疼痛試驗
급성란미염%조기진단%안압동통가극시험%호흡동통시험
Acute appendicitis%Early diagnosis%Pressure pain worsen test%Breath pain worsen test
目的:评价按压疼痛加剧试验和呼吸疼痛试验对于早期急性阑尾炎的诊断价值。方法前瞻性入组2010年10月至2012年12月间暨南大学附属第一医院收治的101例发病时间在6h以内的上腹或中上腹部疼痛患者,分别进行按压疼痛加剧试验和呼吸疼痛试验,通过与术后病理诊断结果(早期急性阑尾炎或非阑尾炎腹痛)进行对比,来计算两种试验方法的灵敏度和特异度,并通过绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线来分析其对早期急性阑尾炎的诊断价值。结果52例患者经术后病理证实为早期急性阑尾炎,另49例为非阑尾炎腹痛。按压疼痛加剧试验诊断早期急性阑尾炎的灵敏度和特异度分别为87.5%和72.1%,呼吸疼痛试验分别为53.8%和83.7%。按压疼痛加剧试验的ROC曲线下面积为0.786(95% CI:0.693~0.878),略高于呼吸疼痛试验的0.688(95% CI:0.583~0.792)。结论按压疼痛加剧试验对于早期急性阑尾炎具有较高的诊断价值,但特异度不如呼吸疼痛试验。
目的:評價按壓疼痛加劇試驗和呼吸疼痛試驗對于早期急性闌尾炎的診斷價值。方法前瞻性入組2010年10月至2012年12月間暨南大學附屬第一醫院收治的101例髮病時間在6h以內的上腹或中上腹部疼痛患者,分彆進行按壓疼痛加劇試驗和呼吸疼痛試驗,通過與術後病理診斷結果(早期急性闌尾炎或非闌尾炎腹痛)進行對比,來計算兩種試驗方法的靈敏度和特異度,併通過繪製受試者工作特徵(ROC)麯線來分析其對早期急性闌尾炎的診斷價值。結果52例患者經術後病理證實為早期急性闌尾炎,另49例為非闌尾炎腹痛。按壓疼痛加劇試驗診斷早期急性闌尾炎的靈敏度和特異度分彆為87.5%和72.1%,呼吸疼痛試驗分彆為53.8%和83.7%。按壓疼痛加劇試驗的ROC麯線下麵積為0.786(95% CI:0.693~0.878),略高于呼吸疼痛試驗的0.688(95% CI:0.583~0.792)。結論按壓疼痛加劇試驗對于早期急性闌尾炎具有較高的診斷價值,但特異度不如呼吸疼痛試驗。
목적:평개안압동통가극시험화호흡동통시험대우조기급성란미염적진단개치。방법전첨성입조2010년10월지2012년12월간기남대학부속제일의원수치적101례발병시간재6h이내적상복혹중상복부동통환자,분별진행안압동통가극시험화호흡동통시험,통과여술후병리진단결과(조기급성란미염혹비란미염복통)진행대비,래계산량충시험방법적령민도화특이도,병통과회제수시자공작특정(ROC)곡선래분석기대조기급성란미염적진단개치。결과52례환자경술후병리증실위조기급성란미염,령49례위비란미염복통。안압동통가극시험진단조기급성란미염적령민도화특이도분별위87.5%화72.1%,호흡동통시험분별위53.8%화83.7%。안압동통가극시험적ROC곡선하면적위0.786(95% CI:0.693~0.878),략고우호흡동통시험적0.688(95% CI:0.583~0.792)。결론안압동통가극시험대우조기급성란미염구유교고적진단개치,단특이도불여호흡동통시험。
Objective To compare the applied value of the pressure aggravation test and breath aggravation test in the diagnosis of early acute appendicitis. Methods A total of 101 cases with epigastralgia, middle or upper abdomen pain, disease duration within 6 hours undergoing pressure aggravation test and breath aggravation test respectively in our hospital between October 2010 and December 2012 were prospectively enrolled. By comparing with the postoperative pathological diagnosis (early acute appendicitis and other abdominal pain), the sensitivity and specificity of these two tests were calculated. Through analyzing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the diagnostic value of early acute appendicitis was evaluated. Results Fifty-two cases of early acute appendicitis and 49 cases of other abdominal pain were diagnosed by postoperative pathologic results. The sensitivity and specificity of the pressure aggravation test were 87.5% and 72.1% and of the breath aggravation test were 53.8% and 83.7% respectively. The area under the ROC curve of the pressure aggravation test was 0.786 (95% CI: 0.693-0.878), similar to that of the breath aggravation test (0.688, 95% CI: 0.583-0.792). Conclusion The pressure aggravation test has higher value to diagnose early acute appendicitis, while the breath aggravation test has better specificity.