武警医学
武警醫學
무경의학
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE PEOPLE'S ARMED POLICE FORCES
2014年
12期
1199-1201,1204
,共4页
杨戈雄%袁杰%高爽%李滔%滕煜%马军令
楊戈雄%袁傑%高爽%李滔%滕煜%馬軍令
양과웅%원걸%고상%리도%등욱%마군령
无肌松药%气管插管%全身麻醉%鼻内镜手术
無肌鬆藥%氣管插管%全身痳醉%鼻內鏡手術
무기송약%기관삽관%전신마취%비내경수술
without muscle relaxant%tracheal intubation%general anesthesia%nasal endoscopic operation
目的:探讨在无肌松药全麻下行鼻内镜手术的可行性。方法将120例ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级择期行鼻内镜手术的患者随机分成常规肌松药组(Ⅰ组)及无肌松药插管维持组(Ⅱ组)各60例。Ⅰ组予维库溴铵0.08~0.1 mg/kg诱导,在患者有体动时,或每40 min静脉注射0.05 mg/kg维持肌松;Ⅱ组在复合气道充分表面麻醉后行气管插管,术中无肌松药维持。记录两组麻醉前(T0)、麻醉诱导后2 min(T1)、气管插管后2 min(T2)、手术开始后2 min(T3)、手术开始后20 min(T4)、拔管后5 min( T5)各时点的血压( MAP)、心率( HR)、脉搏氧饱和度( SpO2)、呼气末二氧化碳分压( PetCO2),比较两组术中体动次数、麻醉苏醒及拔管时间、不良反应、并发症,以及术中追加输注瑞芬太尼、丙泊酚的用药量。结果两组T1时点MAP、HR较T0均有下降(P<0.05),T2与T0比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);Ⅱ组T3时点MAP较T0上升,与Ⅰ组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);Ⅰ、Ⅱ组术后命令反应时间[(9.0±2.4) min vs (2.1±1.2) min]、拔管时间[(15.1±3.6) min vs (3.5±1.6) min]、离室时间[(25.5±8.2) min vs (5.6±2.7) min]比较,Ⅰ组长于Ⅱ组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论无肌松药气管插管全麻下实施鼻内镜手术麻醉效果可靠,安全可行。
目的:探討在無肌鬆藥全痳下行鼻內鏡手術的可行性。方法將120例ASAⅠ~Ⅱ級擇期行鼻內鏡手術的患者隨機分成常規肌鬆藥組(Ⅰ組)及無肌鬆藥插管維持組(Ⅱ組)各60例。Ⅰ組予維庫溴銨0.08~0.1 mg/kg誘導,在患者有體動時,或每40 min靜脈註射0.05 mg/kg維持肌鬆;Ⅱ組在複閤氣道充分錶麵痳醉後行氣管插管,術中無肌鬆藥維持。記錄兩組痳醉前(T0)、痳醉誘導後2 min(T1)、氣管插管後2 min(T2)、手術開始後2 min(T3)、手術開始後20 min(T4)、拔管後5 min( T5)各時點的血壓( MAP)、心率( HR)、脈搏氧飽和度( SpO2)、呼氣末二氧化碳分壓( PetCO2),比較兩組術中體動次數、痳醉囌醒及拔管時間、不良反應、併髮癥,以及術中追加輸註瑞芬太尼、丙泊酚的用藥量。結果兩組T1時點MAP、HR較T0均有下降(P<0.05),T2與T0比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);Ⅱ組T3時點MAP較T0上升,與Ⅰ組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);Ⅰ、Ⅱ組術後命令反應時間[(9.0±2.4) min vs (2.1±1.2) min]、拔管時間[(15.1±3.6) min vs (3.5±1.6) min]、離室時間[(25.5±8.2) min vs (5.6±2.7) min]比較,Ⅰ組長于Ⅱ組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01)。結論無肌鬆藥氣管插管全痳下實施鼻內鏡手術痳醉效果可靠,安全可行。
목적:탐토재무기송약전마하행비내경수술적가행성。방법장120례ASAⅠ~Ⅱ급택기행비내경수술적환자수궤분성상규기송약조(Ⅰ조)급무기송약삽관유지조(Ⅱ조)각60례。Ⅰ조여유고추안0.08~0.1 mg/kg유도,재환자유체동시,혹매40 min정맥주사0.05 mg/kg유지기송;Ⅱ조재복합기도충분표면마취후행기관삽관,술중무기송약유지。기록량조마취전(T0)、마취유도후2 min(T1)、기관삽관후2 min(T2)、수술개시후2 min(T3)、수술개시후20 min(T4)、발관후5 min( T5)각시점적혈압( MAP)、심솔( HR)、맥박양포화도( SpO2)、호기말이양화탄분압( PetCO2),비교량조술중체동차수、마취소성급발관시간、불량반응、병발증,이급술중추가수주서분태니、병박분적용약량。결과량조T1시점MAP、HR교T0균유하강(P<0.05),T2여T0비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);Ⅱ조T3시점MAP교T0상승,여Ⅰ조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);Ⅰ、Ⅱ조술후명령반응시간[(9.0±2.4) min vs (2.1±1.2) min]、발관시간[(15.1±3.6) min vs (3.5±1.6) min]、리실시간[(25.5±8.2) min vs (5.6±2.7) min]비교,Ⅰ조장우Ⅱ조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01)。결론무기송약기관삽관전마하실시비내경수술마취효과가고,안전가행。
Objective To investigate the effect and feasibility of anesthesia without muscle relaxant in nasal endoscopic opera-tion.Methods 120 patients with ASAⅠ-Ⅱundergoing nasal endoscopic operation were randomly divided into normal muscle relaxant use group ( group Ⅰ) and intubation without muscle relaxant maintenance group ( groupⅡ) , 60 cases in each.GroupⅠwas treated with vecuronium 0.08-0.1 mg/kg induced, in patients with body movement or per 40min intravenous infusion of 0.05 mg/kg maintai-ning muscle relaxation;group Ⅱtracheal intubation after complex full airway surface anesthesia but without muscle relaxants mainte-nance during operation.Blood pressure ( MAP) , heart rate ( HR) , pulse oxygen saturation ( SpO2 ) , end tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure ( PetCO2 ) were recorded in each time point in the two groups before anesthesia ( T0 ) , 2 min after anesthesia induction ( T1 ) , 2 min after endotracheal intubation ( T2 ) , 2 min after the start of operation ( T3 ) , 20 min after the start of operation ( T4 ) , and 5 min after extubation ( T5) .The body movement frequency intraoperation , recovery time from anesthesia and extubation time, adverse reac-tions and complications and intraoperative additional infusion dosage of remifentanil and propofol were compared between the two groups.Results In both groups, T0 ~T4 each observation point,HR, MAP, SpO2 and PetCO2 changes were not significantly different (P>0.05).Breathing the air after 5 min(T5), SPO2 in group Ⅱwere higher than those in groupⅠ, PetCO2 in groupⅡlower than that in groupⅠ, there were significant differences between the two groups (P<0.05).In groupⅡ,anesthesia recovery time and ex-tubation time were significantly shorter than those in group Ⅰ( P <0.01).There were no adverse reaction and complication. Conclusions The effect of nasal endoscopic surgery under tracheal intubation general anesthesia without muscle relaxant is reliable, safe and feasible.