自然科学史研究
自然科學史研究
자연과학사연구
STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF NATURAL SCIENCES
2014年
2期
158-172
,共15页
《化学鉴原》%韦而司%徐寿%傅兰雅%《化学鉴原补编》%底本比较
《化學鑒原》%韋而司%徐壽%傅蘭雅%《化學鑒原補編》%底本比較
《화학감원》%위이사%서수%부란아%《화학감원보편》%저본비교
通过对比《化学鉴原》及其底本Wells's Principles and Applications of Chemistry(1858),发现该书在翻译过程中有内容的更新与增补.更新增补内容主要来源于《化学鉴原补编》的底本Chemistry,Inorganic and Organic,with Experiments andA Comparison of Equivalent and Molecular Formulae(1867).《化学鉴原》较原著更好地体现了新的化学知识,且与《化学鉴原补编》的对应内容有一定互补性.
通過對比《化學鑒原》及其底本Wells's Principles and Applications of Chemistry(1858),髮現該書在翻譯過程中有內容的更新與增補.更新增補內容主要來源于《化學鑒原補編》的底本Chemistry,Inorganic and Organic,with Experiments andA Comparison of Equivalent and Molecular Formulae(1867).《化學鑒原》較原著更好地體現瞭新的化學知識,且與《化學鑒原補編》的對應內容有一定互補性.
통과대비《화학감원》급기저본Wells's Principles and Applications of Chemistry(1858),발현해서재번역과정중유내용적경신여증보.경신증보내용주요래원우《화학감원보편》적저본Chemistry,Inorganic and Organic,with Experiments andA Comparison of Equivalent and Molecular Formulae(1867).《화학감원》교원저경호지체현료신적화학지식,차여《화학감원보편》적대응내용유일정호보성.
