岭南现代临床外科
嶺南現代臨床外科
령남현대림상외과
LINGNAN MODERN CLINICS IN SURGERY
2014年
6期
694-697
,共4页
叶露%陈劲峰%潘景升%王建%蔡卫平%郑海鹏%李高鹏
葉露%陳勁峰%潘景升%王建%蔡衛平%鄭海鵬%李高鵬
협로%진경봉%반경승%왕건%채위평%정해붕%리고붕
艾滋病%铜绿假单胞菌%机会性感染%耐药性
艾滋病%銅綠假單胞菌%機會性感染%耐藥性
애자병%동록가단포균%궤회성감염%내약성
AIDS%Pseudomonas aeruginosa%Opportunistic infections%Antibiotic resistance
目的:探讨艾滋病与非艾滋病患者铜绿假单胞菌感染病例感染途径、临床表现及药敏结果的差异性,以期提高对相关疾病的临床诊疗水平。方法选取2010年1月~2014年8月32例艾滋病患者合并铜绿假单胞菌感染病例作为观察组,另选同时期27例非艾滋病患者铜绿假单胞菌感染病例作为对照组。对比分析两组患者感染途径、临床表现、耐药率的差异性。结果艾滋病及非艾滋病患者铜绿假单胞菌感染主要感染途径均为呼吸道。观察组临床症状以发热、咳嗽、咳痰为主,对照组临床症状相对更复杂。观察组分离出耐药菌株20株(62.5%),对照组分离耐药菌24株(88.9%)(P<0.05)。观察组菌株对亚胺培南及美洛配能较敏感,对照组菌株对阿米卡星、头孢噻肟及美洛配能敏感。结论艾滋病与非艾滋病患者铜绿假单胞菌感染在临床表现及耐药性方面有差异,临床上须综合分析患者病情,选择敏感抗生素。
目的:探討艾滋病與非艾滋病患者銅綠假單胞菌感染病例感染途徑、臨床錶現及藥敏結果的差異性,以期提高對相關疾病的臨床診療水平。方法選取2010年1月~2014年8月32例艾滋病患者閤併銅綠假單胞菌感染病例作為觀察組,另選同時期27例非艾滋病患者銅綠假單胞菌感染病例作為對照組。對比分析兩組患者感染途徑、臨床錶現、耐藥率的差異性。結果艾滋病及非艾滋病患者銅綠假單胞菌感染主要感染途徑均為呼吸道。觀察組臨床癥狀以髮熱、咳嗽、咳痰為主,對照組臨床癥狀相對更複雜。觀察組分離齣耐藥菌株20株(62.5%),對照組分離耐藥菌24株(88.9%)(P<0.05)。觀察組菌株對亞胺培南及美洛配能較敏感,對照組菌株對阿米卡星、頭孢噻肟及美洛配能敏感。結論艾滋病與非艾滋病患者銅綠假單胞菌感染在臨床錶現及耐藥性方麵有差異,臨床上鬚綜閤分析患者病情,選擇敏感抗生素。
목적:탐토애자병여비애자병환자동록가단포균감염병례감염도경、림상표현급약민결과적차이성,이기제고대상관질병적림상진료수평。방법선취2010년1월~2014년8월32례애자병환자합병동록가단포균감염병례작위관찰조,령선동시기27례비애자병환자동록가단포균감염병례작위대조조。대비분석량조환자감염도경、림상표현、내약솔적차이성。결과애자병급비애자병환자동록가단포균감염주요감염도경균위호흡도。관찰조림상증상이발열、해수、해담위주,대조조림상증상상대경복잡。관찰조분리출내약균주20주(62.5%),대조조분리내약균24주(88.9%)(P<0.05)。관찰조균주대아알배남급미락배능교민감,대조조균주대아미잡성、두포새우급미락배능민감。결론애자병여비애자병환자동록가단포균감염재림상표현급내약성방면유차이,림상상수종합분석환자병정,선택민감항생소。
Objective To investigate differences in infective pathway , clinical manifestations and drug susceptibility results of pseudomonas aeruginosa infections between AIDS and non-AIDS patients, for improving diagnosis and treatment. Methods Totally 32 AIDS patients with pseudomonas aeruginosa infections from Jan..2010 to Aug..2014 were selected as the research subjects in observation group,and another 27 non-AIDS patients with pseudomonas aeruginosa infections during the same period were selected as the control group..Differences of two groups in infective pathway,.clinical manifestations and drug susceptibility results were compared and analyzed. .Results The primary infective pathway of two groups was the same and derived from respiratory tract infection..The main clinical manifestations of observation group were fever,.cough and sputum..The clinical manifestations of control group were more complicated.. Twenty strains (62.5%) of pathogens were isolated from the patients of observation group,.and 24 strains(88.9%) were isolated (P<0.05) from control group..In the observation group, P.aeruginosa had a low resistance to imipenem and meropenem..In the control group,.P. aeruginosa had a relatively low resistance to amikacin,.cefotaxime and meropenem..Conclusion The difference of clinical manifestation and drug susceptibility results were significant between pseudomonas aeruginosa infections between AIDS and non-AIDS patients. .Clinician should analyse the different conditions of patients comprehensively and choose the antibiotics reasonably.