中国微创外科杂志
中國微創外科雜誌
중국미창외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY
2014年
12期
1071-1073
,共3页
张耕%韩永正%李民%王军%郭向阳
張耕%韓永正%李民%王軍%郭嚮暘
장경%한영정%리민%왕군%곽향양
困难气道%Truview EVO2 喉镜%Macintosh喉镜%颈椎活动受限
睏難氣道%Truview EVO2 喉鏡%Macintosh喉鏡%頸椎活動受限
곤난기도%Truview EVO2 후경%Macintosh후경%경추활동수한
Difficult airway%Truview EVO2 laryngoscope%Macintosh laryngoscope%Neck rigidity
目的:评价Truview EVO2喉镜与Macintosh喉镜用于颈椎活动受限患者气管插管的临床应用情况。方法择期颈椎活动受限经口气管插管全麻手术49例,静脉麻醉诱导后,随机先后使用Truview EVO2喉镜与Macintosh喉镜显露喉部,并采用喉部暴露条件好的喉镜行气管插管。比较2种喉镜Cormack-Lehane(C-L)分级,喉部结构显露时间和声门显露时血流动力学改变。结果 Truview EVO2喉镜组C-L分级显著优于Macintosh喉镜组(Z=-5.488,P=0.000),喉部结构显露时间明显长于Macintosh喉镜组[(15.9±6.7)s vs.(12.3±4.5)s,t=4.304,P=0.000]。2种喉镜声门显露时HR、SBP、MAP变化无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论 Truview EVO2喉镜用于颈椎活动受限患者气管插管效果明显优于Macintosh喉镜,可提高气管插管成功率,对于部分困难气道患者具有较好的应用价值。
目的:評價Truview EVO2喉鏡與Macintosh喉鏡用于頸椎活動受限患者氣管插管的臨床應用情況。方法擇期頸椎活動受限經口氣管插管全痳手術49例,靜脈痳醉誘導後,隨機先後使用Truview EVO2喉鏡與Macintosh喉鏡顯露喉部,併採用喉部暴露條件好的喉鏡行氣管插管。比較2種喉鏡Cormack-Lehane(C-L)分級,喉部結構顯露時間和聲門顯露時血流動力學改變。結果 Truview EVO2喉鏡組C-L分級顯著優于Macintosh喉鏡組(Z=-5.488,P=0.000),喉部結構顯露時間明顯長于Macintosh喉鏡組[(15.9±6.7)s vs.(12.3±4.5)s,t=4.304,P=0.000]。2種喉鏡聲門顯露時HR、SBP、MAP變化無統計學差異(P>0.05)。結論 Truview EVO2喉鏡用于頸椎活動受限患者氣管插管效果明顯優于Macintosh喉鏡,可提高氣管插管成功率,對于部分睏難氣道患者具有較好的應用價值。
목적:평개Truview EVO2후경여Macintosh후경용우경추활동수한환자기관삽관적림상응용정황。방법택기경추활동수한경구기관삽관전마수술49례,정맥마취유도후,수궤선후사용Truview EVO2후경여Macintosh후경현로후부,병채용후부폭로조건호적후경행기관삽관。비교2충후경Cormack-Lehane(C-L)분급,후부결구현로시간화성문현로시혈류동역학개변。결과 Truview EVO2후경조C-L분급현저우우Macintosh후경조(Z=-5.488,P=0.000),후부결구현로시간명현장우Macintosh후경조[(15.9±6.7)s vs.(12.3±4.5)s,t=4.304,P=0.000]。2충후경성문현로시HR、SBP、MAP변화무통계학차이(P>0.05)。결론 Truview EVO2후경용우경추활동수한환자기관삽관효과명현우우Macintosh후경,가제고기관삽관성공솔,대우부분곤난기도환자구유교호적응용개치。
Objective To compare the clinical application between Truview EVO 2 and Macintosh laryngoscopes in endotreachal intubation for patients with restricted neck movement. Methods Forty-nine patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation were enrolled. After intravenous anesthetic induction, orotracheal intubation was randomly performed by an experienced anesthesiologist with both Truview EVO 2 and Macintosh laryngoscopes. Then the patient was intubated with the laryngoscope with better view. Parameters were recorded, including Cormack-Lehane ( C-L) grade of laryngeal view, the laryngeal exposuring time, and hemodynamic changes during intubation. Results Better C-L grade of laryngeal view was achieved in the Truview EVO2 laryngoscope as compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope (Z=-5.488, P=0.000).The laryngeal exposuring time of Truview EVO2 laryngoscopy was longer than that of Macintosh laryngoscope [(15.9 ±6.7) s vs.(12.3 ±4.5) s, t=4.304, P =0.000].There was no significantly difference in hemodynamic changes between Truview EVO 2 and Macintosh laryngoscopes(P>0.05). Conclusions In patients with limitation of neck movement, the Truview EVO2 laryngoscope is more feasible and effective than Macintosh laryngoscope in orotracheal intubalion. The Truview EVO2 laryngoscope is a valuable tool for managing difficult airway for restricted neck movements.