临床外科杂志
臨床外科雜誌
림상외과잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY
2014年
12期
942-944
,共3页
蔡奕欣%付向宁%张霓%徐沁孜%付圣灵%张瑞杰
蔡奕訢%付嚮寧%張霓%徐沁孜%付聖靈%張瑞傑
채혁흔%부향저%장예%서심자%부골령%장서걸
气管狭窄%重建术%预防性气管切开%横行切口
氣管狹窄%重建術%預防性氣管切開%橫行切口
기관협착%중건술%예방성기관절개%횡행절구
trachealstenosis%reconstruction%prophylactictracheotomy%transverseinci-sion
目的:探讨预防性横行气管切开对气管狭窄切除重建术后呼吸道管理及减小吻合口张力的价值。方法22例气管狭窄患者均施行气管病变段切除并对端吻合重建手术,根据是否手术同期接受横行切口气管切开,分为气管切开组10例和非气管切开组12例。分析比较两组患者临床资料。结果气管切开组患者术前CPIS评分(临床肺部感染评分)、声嘶、意识障碍比率均明显高于非气管切开组(P<0.05),全组患者无死亡,两组手术时间、手术出血量、术后呼吸机使用时间、ICU监护时间、抗生素使用时间以及术后ARDS、吻合口瘘等并发症发生率均无明显差异。术后随访22例,随访时间3~32个月,均日常活动正常,无呼吸困难症状,三维CT重建检查无气管狭窄。结论气管切除重建术后行预防性横行气管切开,简化了术后的气道管理,保证了气道的通畅与清洁,同时亦起到减小吻合口张力作用,有效地减少术后并发症,对于气管狭窄重症患者,推荐预防性气管切开。
目的:探討預防性橫行氣管切開對氣管狹窄切除重建術後呼吸道管理及減小吻閤口張力的價值。方法22例氣管狹窄患者均施行氣管病變段切除併對耑吻閤重建手術,根據是否手術同期接受橫行切口氣管切開,分為氣管切開組10例和非氣管切開組12例。分析比較兩組患者臨床資料。結果氣管切開組患者術前CPIS評分(臨床肺部感染評分)、聲嘶、意識障礙比率均明顯高于非氣管切開組(P<0.05),全組患者無死亡,兩組手術時間、手術齣血量、術後呼吸機使用時間、ICU鑑護時間、抗生素使用時間以及術後ARDS、吻閤口瘺等併髮癥髮生率均無明顯差異。術後隨訪22例,隨訪時間3~32箇月,均日常活動正常,無呼吸睏難癥狀,三維CT重建檢查無氣管狹窄。結論氣管切除重建術後行預防性橫行氣管切開,簡化瞭術後的氣道管理,保證瞭氣道的通暢與清潔,同時亦起到減小吻閤口張力作用,有效地減少術後併髮癥,對于氣管狹窄重癥患者,推薦預防性氣管切開。
목적:탐토예방성횡행기관절개대기관협착절제중건술후호흡도관리급감소문합구장력적개치。방법22례기관협착환자균시행기관병변단절제병대단문합중건수술,근거시부수술동기접수횡행절구기관절개,분위기관절개조10례화비기관절개조12례。분석비교량조환자림상자료。결과기관절개조환자술전CPIS평분(림상폐부감염평분)、성시、의식장애비솔균명현고우비기관절개조(P<0.05),전조환자무사망,량조수술시간、수술출혈량、술후호흡궤사용시간、ICU감호시간、항생소사용시간이급술후ARDS、문합구루등병발증발생솔균무명현차이。술후수방22례,수방시간3~32개월,균일상활동정상,무호흡곤난증상,삼유CT중건검사무기관협착。결론기관절제중건술후행예방성횡행기관절개,간화료술후적기도관리,보증료기도적통창여청길,동시역기도감소문합구장력작용,유효지감소술후병발증,대우기관협착중증환자,추천예방성기관절개。
Objective To evaluate the values of airway management and tension relief in prophylactic transverse tracheotomy after tracheal resection and reconstruction for critical patient of tracheal stenosis.Methods The clinical data of22 patients with tracheal stenosis who received tracheal resection andendtoend reconstruction were retrospectively analyzed,including 10 cases with tracheotomy and 12 caseswithout it.Results The clinical pulmonary infection score(CPIS)and ratio of hoarseness and unconsciousness in the tracheotomy group were significantly higher than those of the nontracheotomy group(P <0.05).No inhospital death occurred.There were no significant differences in operation time,intraoperative blood loss,mechanical ventilation duration,ICU hospitalization and the incidence of ARDS andanastomotic fistula between the two groups.Followup time ranged from 3 to 32 months.All patients can achieve normal daily activities without dyspnea complain.Postoperative CT reconstruction showed no tracheal stenosis.Conclusion After tracheal resection and reconstruction,prophylactic transverse tracheotomycan simplify airway management,ensure cleanses,relieve the tension of anastomosis and reduce postoperative complications,which is recommended in critical patient with tracheal stenosis.