实用医学杂志
實用醫學雜誌
실용의학잡지
THE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL MEDICINE
2014年
21期
3388-3391
,共4页
王昊%俞文华%刘群杰%朱强%车志豪%杜权%董晓巧
王昊%俞文華%劉群傑%硃彊%車誌豪%杜權%董曉巧
왕호%유문화%류군걸%주강%차지호%두권%동효교
三叉神经痛%微血管减压%经皮穿刺球囊压迫%前瞻性队列研究
三扠神經痛%微血管減壓%經皮穿刺毬囊壓迫%前瞻性隊列研究
삼차신경통%미혈관감압%경피천자구낭압박%전첨성대렬연구
Trigeminal neuralgia%Microvascular decompression%Percutaneous balloon compression%Prospective cohort study
目的:对微血管减压(MVD)和经皮穿刺球囊压迫(PBC)手术治疗原发性三叉神经痛的临床疗效进行前瞻性分析对比研究,从而可能为临床决策提供较可靠的循证医学依据。方法:利用2010年间杭州市第一人民医院住院三叉神经痛患者,建立前瞻队列研究患者数据库。分为MVD组和PBC组各30例。在术后第0~36个月,由独立观察者对临床疗效进行随访。分级资料比较使用卡方检验,计量资料比较使用t检验,面部疼痛预后采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析,研究终点为随访期结束或出现重度复发。结果:至研究终点,共计纳入60例患者。术前一般资料与文献数据大致相仿,对比无痛生存、轻度复发和重度复发,MVD组要优于PBC组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。就无痛生存期来说,MVD组1年为96.7%,3年为93.3%;PBC组1年为90.0%,3年为83.3%。就3年随访期而言,无论是MVD还是PBC复发多集中在1年左右。结论:由于有可治愈性以及非毁损性的特点,MVD术仍是体质健康三叉神经痛患者的主要治疗手段,与PBC术相比有更高的疼痛缓解率和更长的无痛生存期。
目的:對微血管減壓(MVD)和經皮穿刺毬囊壓迫(PBC)手術治療原髮性三扠神經痛的臨床療效進行前瞻性分析對比研究,從而可能為臨床決策提供較可靠的循證醫學依據。方法:利用2010年間杭州市第一人民醫院住院三扠神經痛患者,建立前瞻隊列研究患者數據庫。分為MVD組和PBC組各30例。在術後第0~36箇月,由獨立觀察者對臨床療效進行隨訪。分級資料比較使用卡方檢驗,計量資料比較使用t檢驗,麵部疼痛預後採用Kaplan-Meier生存分析,研究終點為隨訪期結束或齣現重度複髮。結果:至研究終點,共計納入60例患者。術前一般資料與文獻數據大緻相倣,對比無痛生存、輕度複髮和重度複髮,MVD組要優于PBC組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。就無痛生存期來說,MVD組1年為96.7%,3年為93.3%;PBC組1年為90.0%,3年為83.3%。就3年隨訪期而言,無論是MVD還是PBC複髮多集中在1年左右。結論:由于有可治愈性以及非燬損性的特點,MVD術仍是體質健康三扠神經痛患者的主要治療手段,與PBC術相比有更高的疼痛緩解率和更長的無痛生存期。
목적:대미혈관감압(MVD)화경피천자구낭압박(PBC)수술치료원발성삼차신경통적림상료효진행전첨성분석대비연구,종이가능위림상결책제공교가고적순증의학의거。방법:이용2010년간항주시제일인민의원주원삼차신경통환자,건립전첨대렬연구환자수거고。분위MVD조화PBC조각30례。재술후제0~36개월,유독립관찰자대림상료효진행수방。분급자료비교사용잡방검험,계량자료비교사용t검험,면부동통예후채용Kaplan-Meier생존분석,연구종점위수방기결속혹출현중도복발。결과:지연구종점,공계납입60례환자。술전일반자료여문헌수거대치상방,대비무통생존、경도복발화중도복발,MVD조요우우PBC조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。취무통생존기래설,MVD조1년위96.7%,3년위93.3%;PBC조1년위90.0%,3년위83.3%。취3년수방기이언,무론시MVD환시PBC복발다집중재1년좌우。결론:유우유가치유성이급비훼손성적특점,MVD술잉시체질건강삼차신경통환자적주요치료수단,여PBC술상비유경고적동통완해솔화경장적무통생존기。
Objective To compare clinical outcome of microvascular decompression (MVD) and percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) by using a prospective cohort study in order to provide a reliable evidence for the clinical decision-making. Methods Patients with trigeminal neuralgia hospitalized at Hangzhou First People′s Hospital in 2010 were chosen as database for cohort study. The patients were divided into MVD group (30 cases) and PBC group (30 cases). The clinical efficacy was followed by independent observers for 36 months after surgery. Chi-square test for hierarchical data, t test for quantitative data, and Kaplan-Meier plot for clinical outcomes were applied in the research. The endpoint was follow-up accomplishment or severe occurrence. Results Sixty patients were included in the research till the endpoint. The general records before surgery were almost the same with the literature records. By comparing painless period, mild and severe relapse, MVD group was superior to PBC group (P < 0.05). As for the painless survival period, MVD group was 96.7% of pain free after 1 year, 93.3% after 3 years, while PBC group was 90.0% after 1 year and 83.3% after 3 years. Regarding 3 years of follow-up, the relapse seemed occurred after 1 year in both groups. Conclusions As a curative and nondestructive procedure , MVD is more effective and has longer lasting pain free period , which should be considered as the first choice of treatment for trigeminal neuralgia in healthy people.