国际医药卫生导报
國際醫藥衛生導報
국제의약위생도보
INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE & HEALTH GUIDANCE NEWS
2014年
24期
3708-3712
,共5页
陈锦全%卢启冰%黄福永%谭剑明%吴少鹏%许艳芬
陳錦全%盧啟冰%黃福永%譚劍明%吳少鵬%許豔芬
진금전%로계빙%황복영%담검명%오소붕%허염분
职业病危害%控制效果分析%化学毒物%粉尘%噪声
職業病危害%控製效果分析%化學毒物%粉塵%譟聲
직업병위해%공제효과분석%화학독물%분진%조성
Occupation hazards%Control effect analysis%Chemical poisons%Dust%Noise
目的 探讨浮法玻璃厂职业病危害的控制效果.方法 采用职业卫生学调查、职业病危害因素与职业病危害防护设施检测及职业健康检查等方法,评定职业病危害控制效果.结果 主要职业病危害因素有粉尘、噪声、高温、化学毒物(氨、一氧化碳、二氧化碳、二氧化氮、二氧化硫、二氧化锡、非甲烷总烃等)、工频电磁场等.13份粉尘中的游离二氧化硅(SiO2)含量平均(34.51±27.38)%(2.65% ~ 71.74%).总粉尘浓度检测41个点,合格率95.12%(39/41).噪声强度检测32个点,合格率93.75%(30/32).化学毒物浓度检测66个点,合格率100.00%.高温检测8个点,其中4个点(50.00%)超过职业接触限值.工频电场强度检测结果均合格.职业病防护设施的罩口风速0.03 ~ 3.26 m/s.职业健康检查389人,未检出疑似职业病患者,发现高温或噪声作业禁忌证3人.结论 化学毒物和工频电场的职业病危害控制效果较好,粉尘和噪声危害的控制效果尚好,而高温危害的控制效果较差.需加强高温、噪声和粉尘危害的预防控制工作.
目的 探討浮法玻璃廠職業病危害的控製效果.方法 採用職業衛生學調查、職業病危害因素與職業病危害防護設施檢測及職業健康檢查等方法,評定職業病危害控製效果.結果 主要職業病危害因素有粉塵、譟聲、高溫、化學毒物(氨、一氧化碳、二氧化碳、二氧化氮、二氧化硫、二氧化錫、非甲烷總烴等)、工頻電磁場等.13份粉塵中的遊離二氧化硅(SiO2)含量平均(34.51±27.38)%(2.65% ~ 71.74%).總粉塵濃度檢測41箇點,閤格率95.12%(39/41).譟聲彊度檢測32箇點,閤格率93.75%(30/32).化學毒物濃度檢測66箇點,閤格率100.00%.高溫檢測8箇點,其中4箇點(50.00%)超過職業接觸限值.工頻電場彊度檢測結果均閤格.職業病防護設施的罩口風速0.03 ~ 3.26 m/s.職業健康檢查389人,未檢齣疑似職業病患者,髮現高溫或譟聲作業禁忌證3人.結論 化學毒物和工頻電場的職業病危害控製效果較好,粉塵和譟聲危害的控製效果尚好,而高溫危害的控製效果較差.需加彊高溫、譟聲和粉塵危害的預防控製工作.
목적 탐토부법파리엄직업병위해적공제효과.방법 채용직업위생학조사、직업병위해인소여직업병위해방호설시검측급직업건강검사등방법,평정직업병위해공제효과.결과 주요직업병위해인소유분진、조성、고온、화학독물(안、일양화탄、이양화탄、이양화담、이양화류、이양화석、비갑완총경등)、공빈전자장등.13빈분진중적유리이양화규(SiO2)함량평균(34.51±27.38)%(2.65% ~ 71.74%).총분진농도검측41개점,합격솔95.12%(39/41).조성강도검측32개점,합격솔93.75%(30/32).화학독물농도검측66개점,합격솔100.00%.고온검측8개점,기중4개점(50.00%)초과직업접촉한치.공빈전장강도검측결과균합격.직업병방호설시적조구풍속0.03 ~ 3.26 m/s.직업건강검사389인,미검출의사직업병환자,발현고온혹조성작업금기증3인.결론 화학독물화공빈전장적직업병위해공제효과교호,분진화조성위해적공제효과상호,이고온위해적공제효과교차.수가강고온、조성화분진위해적예방공제공작.
Objective To explore the hazard control effect of occupation disease at a float glass factory.Methods Occupational hygienic investigation,occupational hazards and protecting facilities for occupational hazards detection,and occupational health examination were used to evaluate the control effect of occupational hazards.Results The major hazard factors causing occupation diseases were dust,noise,high temperature,chemical toxicants (ammonia,carbon monoxide,carbon dioxide,nitrogen dioxide,sulfur dioxide,two tin oxide,and non-methane total hydrocarbon),and electromagnetic field.Free silica dust in 13 copies (SiO2) of contents was average (34.51 ± 27.38)% (2.65% ~ 71.74%).Total dust concentration was detected at 41 points,with a qualified rate of 95.12% (39/41).The intensity of noise was detected at 32 points,with a qualified rate of 93.75% (30/32).Chemical toxicant concentrations were detected at 66 points,with a qualified rate of 100.00%.High temperature test was carried out at 8 points,of which 4 points (50.00%) were over the occupation contact limiting value.The detection results of power frequency electric field strength were all qualified.The face velocity of occupation disease prevention facilities was 0.03 ~ 3.26 m/s.389 people took occupation health examination; no one were suspected with occupation disease,and 3 were found with high temperature or noise operation contraindication.Conclusions The occupation disease harm at chemical toxicants and power frequency electric field is controlled well.The control effect of dust and noise hazards is good.The harm of high temperature control effect is poor.Prevention and control work of high temperature,noise,and dust hazards needs to be enhanced.