CAJ | 학술논문

魏源的儿子魏耆说魏源的祖籍在江西太和县，而《辞源》《辞海》只讲到历史上山西、云南、安徽三省设有太和县，却没有关于江西太和县的只言片语，但说历史上的江西有泰和县。依《辞源》《辞海》之说，若魏源的祖籍在太和县，就不可能在江西，若在江西则应该是泰和县。考历代史志，江西历史上确有太和县，但明萧执《洪武志序》关于太和县得名的天人感应说法，不足为信。泰和县不仅江西有，安徽也有。故《辞源》《辞海》关于“太和”“泰和”的辞条，叙及历史上的太和县与泰和县，都应作相应的修改。
위원적인자위기설위원적조적재강서태화현，이《사원》《사해》지강도역사상산서、운남、안휘삼성설유태화현，각몰유관우강서태화현적지언편어，단설역사상적강서유태화현。의《사원》《사해》지설，약위원적조적재태화현，취불가능재강서，약재강서칙응해시태화현。고역대사지，강서역사상학유태화현，단명소집《홍무지서》관우태화현득명적천인감응설법，불족위신。태화현불부강서유，안휘야유。고《사원》《사해》관우“태화”“태화”적사조，서급역사상적태화현여태화현，도응작상응적수개。
Wei Yuan’s son Wei Qi said that Taihe (太和) County of Jiangxi Province was his father’s ancestral home. But both Ci Yuan and Ci Hai provide the information that in the history Taihe (太和) County has been set up only in Shanxi Province, Yunnan Province and Anhui Province but didn’t offer any information that Taihe (太和) County has once been set up in Jiangxi Province. Yet, they offered there was Taihe (泰和) County in Jiangxi Province . Thus, according to Ci Yuan and Ci Hai, if Wei Yuan’s ancestral home is Taihe (太和) County, it should not be in Jiangxi Province. Once it is in Jiangxi Province, it should be Taihe (泰和) County. According to the Historical Annals there was really Taihe (太和) County. But it is unbelievable according to the information on the synonymy of Taihe (太和) County said in “Hong Wu Zhi Xu” by Ming Xiao. Both Jiangxi Province and Anhui Province had Taihe (泰和) County. So, it needs to correct the information about Taihe(泰和) County or Taihe (太和) County provided in Ci Yuan and Ci Hai.