海军医学杂志
海軍醫學雜誌
해군의학잡지
JOURNAL OF NAVY MEDICINE
2014年
6期
452-453,515
,共3页
彭慧平%卢晓欣%汤永建%房卫红%韩丹%田君
彭慧平%盧曉訢%湯永建%房衛紅%韓丹%田君
팽혜평%로효흔%탕영건%방위홍%한단%전군
头痛%创伤%颅脑%氧%高压氧%舱外高流量氧%疼痛视觉模拟评分
頭痛%創傷%顱腦%氧%高壓氧%艙外高流量氧%疼痛視覺模擬評分
두통%창상%로뇌%양%고압양%창외고류량양%동통시각모의평분
Headache%Traumatic brain injury%Hyperbaric oxygen%Outside chamber high-flow oxygen%Visual analog score
目的:探讨氧与药物联合应用治疗颅脑外伤后头痛的效果。方法对2010年4月至2012年3月共105例颅脑损伤后头痛患者进行氧与药物联合应用的对照研究。经患者知情同意,医院伦理委员会批准,将105例患者分为3组:高压氧组(42例),舱外高流量氧组(36例)和对照组(27例)。以疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)作为头痛治疗效果评价方法。3组患者均进行常规药物治疗,即应用改善微循环、营养神经、镇痛等药物,高压氧组加用高压氧治疗,舱外高流量组加用舱外高流量氧治疗(常压氧)。结果治疗2个疗程后高压氧组、舱外高流量氧组、对照组的VAS评分别为(1.24±1.63)、(3.21±2.12)、(4.13±1.42)分;头痛次数为(1.67±0.62)、(3.87±1.29)、(4.28±0.75)次/周、头痛持续时间分别为(1.48±0.87)、(2.52±0.92)、(4.37±0.96)h。各组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。3组患者中高压氧组治愈率最高,舱外高流量氧组效果次之,前2组疗效均优于对照组,各组之间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对颅脑创伤后头痛患者,联合应用氧与药物治疗是既有效又安全的治疗方案。
目的:探討氧與藥物聯閤應用治療顱腦外傷後頭痛的效果。方法對2010年4月至2012年3月共105例顱腦損傷後頭痛患者進行氧與藥物聯閤應用的對照研究。經患者知情同意,醫院倫理委員會批準,將105例患者分為3組:高壓氧組(42例),艙外高流量氧組(36例)和對照組(27例)。以疼痛視覺模擬評分(VAS)作為頭痛治療效果評價方法。3組患者均進行常規藥物治療,即應用改善微循環、營養神經、鎮痛等藥物,高壓氧組加用高壓氧治療,艙外高流量組加用艙外高流量氧治療(常壓氧)。結果治療2箇療程後高壓氧組、艙外高流量氧組、對照組的VAS評分彆為(1.24±1.63)、(3.21±2.12)、(4.13±1.42)分;頭痛次數為(1.67±0.62)、(3.87±1.29)、(4.28±0.75)次/週、頭痛持續時間分彆為(1.48±0.87)、(2.52±0.92)、(4.37±0.96)h。各組比較差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。3組患者中高壓氧組治愈率最高,艙外高流量氧組效果次之,前2組療效均優于對照組,各組之間比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論對顱腦創傷後頭痛患者,聯閤應用氧與藥物治療是既有效又安全的治療方案。
목적:탐토양여약물연합응용치료로뇌외상후두통적효과。방법대2010년4월지2012년3월공105례로뇌손상후두통환자진행양여약물연합응용적대조연구。경환자지정동의,의원윤리위원회비준,장105례환자분위3조:고압양조(42례),창외고류량양조(36례)화대조조(27례)。이동통시각모의평분(VAS)작위두통치료효과평개방법。3조환자균진행상규약물치료,즉응용개선미순배、영양신경、진통등약물,고압양조가용고압양치료,창외고류량조가용창외고류량양치료(상압양)。결과치료2개료정후고압양조、창외고류량양조、대조조적VAS평분별위(1.24±1.63)、(3.21±2.12)、(4.13±1.42)분;두통차수위(1.67±0.62)、(3.87±1.29)、(4.28±0.75)차/주、두통지속시간분별위(1.48±0.87)、(2.52±0.92)、(4.37±0.96)h。각조비교차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。3조환자중고압양조치유솔최고,창외고류량양조효과차지,전2조료효균우우대조조,각조지간비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론대로뇌창상후두통환자,연합응용양여약물치료시기유효우안전적치료방안。
Objective To explore the effects of oxygen coupled with drug therapy in the treatment of headache following trau -matic brain injury.Methods A comparative study was made on 105 cases of headache induced by traumatic brain injury treated with hyperbaric oxygen ( HBO) coupled with drug therapy from April 2010 to March 2012.The patients were divided into 3 groups:the HBO group (42 cases), the outside chamber high-flow oxygen group (36 cases) and the control group (27 cases).The pain visual analog scores ( VAS) were used as a pain assessment method for the treatment efficacy of headache .The patients of 3 groups were all given routine drug treatment , for improvement of microcirculation , nutrition of neural cells and analgesia .The patients in the HBO and the outside chamber high-flow oxygen groups were respectively supplemented with HBO therapy and high-flow oxygen therapy .Results Af-ter two treatment courses , VAS scores for the HBO group , the outside chamber high-flow oxygen group and the control group were re-spectively (1.24 ±1.63),(3.21 ±2.12)and(4.13 ±1.42).The number of headache for the 3 groups were respectively(1.67 ± 0.62)times/week,(3.87 ±1.29)times/week and(4.28 ±0.75)times/week.And the durations of headache were respectively (1.48 ± 0.87)h,(2.52 ±0.92)h and(4.37 ±0.96) h.Statistical significance could be noted , when comparisons were made between the 3 groups (P<0.05).Results indicated that cure rate of the HBO group was the highest , the outside chamber high-flow oxygen group came the second , which were all superior to that of the control group , and statistical difference could be seen , when comparisons were made between the groups(P<0.05).Conclusion For patients with headache following traumatic brain injury , the combined treatment with oxygen and drugs was a safe and effective treatment method .