CAJ | 학술논문

目的：分析对比急性心肌梗死成功介入治疗及成功溶栓治疗的近期疗效和远期疗效。方法选取本院2009年8月～2011年8月收治急性心肌梗死患者90例，将患者采用随机数字表法分为观察组与对照组，每组45例。观察组患者采取成功介入治疗，对照组采取成功溶栓治疗，比较两组临床疗效，并进行随访比较两组远期疗效。结果观察组患者在入院6 d心电图检查左室射学分数显著优于对照组（P＜0.05）差异具有统计学意义。并分别于6周和12周进行随访两组患者生存率比较，观察组患者显著高于对照组（P＜0.05）差异具有统计学意义。结论在急性心肌梗死患者采取支架介入治疗对心肌梗死改善显著优于溶栓治疗，值得临床广泛应用及推广。
목적：분석대비급성심기경사성공개입치료급성공용전치료적근기료효화원기료효。방법선취본원2009년8월～2011년8월수치급성심기경사환자90례，장환자채용수궤수자표법분위관찰조여대조조，매조45례。관찰조환자채취성공개입치료，대조조채취성공용전치료，비교량조림상료효，병진행수방비교량조원기료효。결과관찰조환자재입원6 d심전도검사좌실사학분수현저우우대조조（P＜0.05）차이구유통계학의의。병분별우6주화12주진행수방량조환자생존솔비교，관찰조환자현저고우대조조（P＜0.05）차이구유통계학의의。결론재급성심기경사환자채취지가개입치료대심기경사개선현저우우용전치료，치득림상엄범응용급추엄。
Objective to contrast analysis of successful intervention treatment of acute myocardial infarction and successful thrombolysis treatment of recent curative effect and the forward curative effect. Methods from August 2009 to August 2009 treated 90 cases of patients with acute myocardial infarction and patients using the random number table Method can be divided into observation group and control group, 45 cases in each group. Observation group of patients taking successful intervention, the control group take successful thrombolysis treatment, compared two groups of clinical curative effect, and follow-up long curative effect in two groups. Results the observation group of patients in the hospital 6 days in ecg examination left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was signiifcantly better than the control group (P<0.05) difference is statistically signiifcant. And in six weeks and 12 weeks respectively are compared, and two groups of patients survival rate of follow-up observation group of patients is signiifcantly higher than control group (P<0.05) difference is statistically signiifcant. Conclusions in patients with acute myocardial infarction (mi) to support intervention improved signiifcantly better than that of thrombolysis therapy of myocardial infarction, worth clinical extensive application and promotion.