CAJ | 학술논문

目的：观察火针治疗网球肘的临床疗效。方法：将80例网球肘患者随机分为治疗组40例和对照组40例，治疗组给予火针治疗，对照组给予电针（疏密波）治疗，两组针刺穴位均为阿是穴、曲池、手三里、外关、合谷。所有患者均每周治疗两次，连续治疗4周。通过视觉模拟评分法（ VAS ）观察两组患者疼痛情况，并对两组疗效进行评价。结果：两组治疗前后VAS评分比较，治疗前无差异，治疗后VAS评分及差值均有统计学意义（P＜0．05）；治疗后两组疗效比较，治愈率有明显差异（P＜0．05），治疗组优于对照组。结论：火针治疗网球肘疗效确切，值得进一步研究和推广。
목적：관찰화침치료망구주적림상료효。방법：장80례망구주환자수궤분위치료조40례화대조조40례，치료조급여화침치료，대조조급여전침（소밀파）치료，량조침자혈위균위아시혈、곡지、수삼리、외관、합곡。소유환자균매주치료량차，련속치료4주。통과시각모의평분법（ VAS ）관찰량조환자동통정황，병대량조료효진행평개。결과：량조치료전후VAS평분비교，치료전무차이，치료후VAS평분급차치균유통계학의의（P＜0．05）；치료후량조료효비교，치유솔유명현차이（P＜0．05），치료조우우대조조。결론：화침치료망구주료효학절，치득진일보연구화추엄。
Objective:To observe the clinically curative effect of fire needling on tennis elbow.Methods:80 cases of tennis elbow were randomly divided into two groups:a treatment group with 40 cases and a control group with 40 cases, By visual analogue scale ( VAS) we observed patients in the two groups according to pain, and we evaluated the efficacy between two groups.The acupuncture points in two groups were the same: Ashi points, Quchi,Shousanli,Waiguan and Hegu.All patients were treated two times every week,and they were continuously treated for 4 weeks.Results:There was no difference of VAS score between two groups before treatment, but there was a significant difference between them after treatment(P<0.05).Conclusion:The effect of fire nee-dling on tennis elbow is exact,and it is worthy of further research and popularization.