建筑与文化
建築與文化
건축여문화
ARCHITECTURE & CULTURE
2014年
12期
128-129
,共2页
历史文化名城%模糊综合评价%KLEE方法%西安
歷史文化名城%模糊綜閤評價%KLEE方法%西安
역사문화명성%모호종합평개%KLEE방법%서안
historical and cultural city%fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation%KLEE method%Xi'an
以西安市为例,研究了模糊综合评价在历史文化名城保护中的应用。从古城风貌特色、文物古迹、历史街区、民俗文化四个方而,选取了十七个指标,构建了历史文化名城保护评价指标体系,并利用KLFF方法确定指标权重。通过专家打分法获得隶属度矩阵,经过模糊运算,结果显示西安市历史文化名城保护现状归属“非常好”、“比较好”、“一般”、“不好”、“较差”的比重分别为:5%、41%、24%、22%、8%。
以西安市為例,研究瞭模糊綜閤評價在歷史文化名城保護中的應用。從古城風貌特色、文物古跡、歷史街區、民俗文化四箇方而,選取瞭十七箇指標,構建瞭歷史文化名城保護評價指標體繫,併利用KLFF方法確定指標權重。通過專傢打分法穫得隸屬度矩陣,經過模糊運算,結果顯示西安市歷史文化名城保護現狀歸屬“非常好”、“比較好”、“一般”、“不好”、“較差”的比重分彆為:5%、41%、24%、22%、8%。
이서안시위례,연구료모호종합평개재역사문화명성보호중적응용。종고성풍모특색、문물고적、역사가구、민속문화사개방이,선취료십칠개지표,구건료역사문화명성보호평개지표체계,병이용KLFF방법학정지표권중。통과전가타분법획득대속도구진,경과모호운산,결과현시서안시역사문화명성보호현상귀속“비상호”、“비교호”、“일반”、“불호”、“교차”적비중분별위:5%、41%、24%、22%、8%。
The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is studied in the application of the historical and cultural city protection:a Case Study on Xi’an City. Seventeen indicators which include the ancient city of landscape features,cultural relics, historical block, four parties, folk culture are choosen to establish the evaluation system of historical and cultural city protection,KLFF method is used to determine the index weight. The membership degree matrix were obtained through the expert scoring method. The results show that xi 'an historical and cultural city protection belongs to “very good” at 5%, “good”at 41%, “ common”at 24%, “bad” at 22%, “very bad”at 8%after fuzzy operators.