临床和实验医学杂志
臨床和實驗醫學雜誌
림상화실험의학잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
2014年
23期
1957-1959
,共3页
CLL%AML%ALL%PTEN%实时PCR%脆性基因
CLL%AML%ALL%PTEN%實時PCR%脆性基因
CLL%AML%ALL%PTEN%실시PCR%취성기인
CLL%AML%ALL%PTEN%Real tine PCR%Brittle gene
目的:利用实时PCR技术检测急性粒细胞白血病( AML)、急性淋巴细胞白血病( ALL)和慢性淋巴细胞白血病( CLL)中的PTEN mRNA的表达状况。方法收集病例AML21例,ALL3例和CLL23例,按照相应的情况进行分组,比较各组PTEN mRNA在不同情况下的表达状态。结果 AML和ALL组的目的基因Ct值没有明显差异( P ﹥0.05),且这两组的Ct值要明显高于CLL组的Ct值( P ﹤0.05),这三个组的Ct值要明显高于对照组的Ct值( P ﹤0.05)。AML组和ALL组的初治组Ct值要高于缓解组的Ct值,CLL组的初治组的Ct值和缓解组的Ct值没有明显差异( P ﹥0.05)。AML、ALL和CLL组的高肿瘤负荷组的Ct值要明显高于低肿瘤负荷组的Ct值( P ﹤0.05)。结论通过实验确定了三种病例的PTEN基因表达状况,为疾病的预判和转归可能提供了辅助的可靠地途径。
目的:利用實時PCR技術檢測急性粒細胞白血病( AML)、急性淋巴細胞白血病( ALL)和慢性淋巴細胞白血病( CLL)中的PTEN mRNA的錶達狀況。方法收集病例AML21例,ALL3例和CLL23例,按照相應的情況進行分組,比較各組PTEN mRNA在不同情況下的錶達狀態。結果 AML和ALL組的目的基因Ct值沒有明顯差異( P ﹥0.05),且這兩組的Ct值要明顯高于CLL組的Ct值( P ﹤0.05),這三箇組的Ct值要明顯高于對照組的Ct值( P ﹤0.05)。AML組和ALL組的初治組Ct值要高于緩解組的Ct值,CLL組的初治組的Ct值和緩解組的Ct值沒有明顯差異( P ﹥0.05)。AML、ALL和CLL組的高腫瘤負荷組的Ct值要明顯高于低腫瘤負荷組的Ct值( P ﹤0.05)。結論通過實驗確定瞭三種病例的PTEN基因錶達狀況,為疾病的預判和轉歸可能提供瞭輔助的可靠地途徑。
목적:이용실시PCR기술검측급성립세포백혈병( AML)、급성림파세포백혈병( ALL)화만성림파세포백혈병( CLL)중적PTEN mRNA적표체상황。방법수집병례AML21례,ALL3례화CLL23례,안조상응적정황진행분조,비교각조PTEN mRNA재불동정황하적표체상태。결과 AML화ALL조적목적기인Ct치몰유명현차이( P ﹥0.05),차저량조적Ct치요명현고우CLL조적Ct치( P ﹤0.05),저삼개조적Ct치요명현고우대조조적Ct치( P ﹤0.05)。AML조화ALL조적초치조Ct치요고우완해조적Ct치,CLL조적초치조적Ct치화완해조적Ct치몰유명현차이( P ﹥0.05)。AML、ALL화CLL조적고종류부하조적Ct치요명현고우저종류부하조적Ct치( P ﹤0.05)。결론통과실험학정료삼충병례적PTEN기인표체상황,위질병적예판화전귀가능제공료보조적가고지도경。
Objective The aim of the present study was to detect the expression of PTEN mRNA in AML,ALL and CLL using real time PCR. Methods Case AML(21),ALL(3)and CLL(23)are grouped according to the respective situation. The PTEN mRNA expression sta_tus in different situations were compared to find out the difference. Results The gene of AML and ALL Ct values did not differ significantly( P﹥0. 05). These Ct value of two groups was significantly higher than the Ct value of CLL group( P ﹤0. 05). The three groups Ct values were sig_nificantly higher than the Ct values( P ﹤0. 05). The Ct values of untreated AML and ALL groups were higher than the Ct values remission group. Meanwhile no significant difference was found in untreated and remittent group of CLL( P ﹥0. 05). The Ct value of the high tumor burden group in AML,ALL and CLL was significantly higher than that of the Ct value of low tumor burden group( P ﹤0. 05). Conclusion Our study indica_ted that detection of PTEN gene expression may provide a reliable way to predict the outcome of the disease.