中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2014年
33期
50-52
,共3页
梁建超%吴志强%陈伟明%夏治民%潘茂才%申花
樑建超%吳誌彊%陳偉明%夏治民%潘茂纔%申花
량건초%오지강%진위명%하치민%반무재%신화
高血压%社区%规范化%健康指导%老年
高血壓%社區%規範化%健康指導%老年
고혈압%사구%규범화%건강지도%노년
High blood pressure%Community%Standardization%Health guidance%The elderly
目的:探讨规范化社区高血压健康指导对老年高血压的控制作用。方法2012年2月—2013年2月期间,选择82例老年高血压患者,随机均分为两组,即对照组予以常规健康指导,而实验组则予以规范化社区高血压健康指导,比较两组血压的控制效果。结果实验组患者指导后收缩压(96.68±10.88)mmHg、舒张压(81.81±5.59)mmHg,对照组患者指导后收缩压(138.57±8.78)mmHg、舒张压(88.92±5.25)mmHg,二者相比明显实验组血压控制效果更为理想,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。并且实验组满意率(95.12%)明显高于对照组(68.29%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论规范化社区高血压健康指导对老年高血压的控制效果极佳,值得推广。
目的:探討規範化社區高血壓健康指導對老年高血壓的控製作用。方法2012年2月—2013年2月期間,選擇82例老年高血壓患者,隨機均分為兩組,即對照組予以常規健康指導,而實驗組則予以規範化社區高血壓健康指導,比較兩組血壓的控製效果。結果實驗組患者指導後收縮壓(96.68±10.88)mmHg、舒張壓(81.81±5.59)mmHg,對照組患者指導後收縮壓(138.57±8.78)mmHg、舒張壓(88.92±5.25)mmHg,二者相比明顯實驗組血壓控製效果更為理想,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01)。併且實驗組滿意率(95.12%)明顯高于對照組(68.29%),差異有統計學意義(P<0.01)。結論規範化社區高血壓健康指導對老年高血壓的控製效果極佳,值得推廣。
목적:탐토규범화사구고혈압건강지도대노년고혈압적공제작용。방법2012년2월—2013년2월기간,선택82례노년고혈압환자,수궤균분위량조,즉대조조여이상규건강지도,이실험조칙여이규범화사구고혈압건강지도,비교량조혈압적공제효과。결과실험조환자지도후수축압(96.68±10.88)mmHg、서장압(81.81±5.59)mmHg,대조조환자지도후수축압(138.57±8.78)mmHg、서장압(88.92±5.25)mmHg,이자상비명현실험조혈압공제효과경위이상,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01)。병차실험조만의솔(95.12%)명현고우대조조(68.29%),차이유통계학의의(P<0.01)。결론규범화사구고혈압건강지도대노년고혈압적공제효과겁가,치득추엄。
Objective To study the effect of standardized hypertension health guidance on controlling the hypertension in the el-derly in community. Methods 82 elderly patients with high blood pressure from February 2012 to February 2013 were selected and equally divided into two groups at random. The control group was treated by routine health guidance, while the experimental group was treated by standardized community hypertension health guidance. And the effects on controlling hypertension of two groups were compared. Results After the guidance, the systolic pressure and diastolic pressure of the experimental group was (96.68 ±10.88) mmHg, (81.81 ±5.59)mmHg, respectively, and that of the control group was (138.57 ±8.78)mmHg, (88.92 ±5.25) mmHg, respectively, the effect of controlling hypertension of the experimental group was better, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.01). The level of satisfaction of the experimental group(95.12%) was much higher than that of the control group (68.29%) with statistically significant difference (P<0.01). Conclusion Standardized hypertension health guid-ance has better effect on controlling the hypertension in the elderly in community, so it is worth promoting.