医学信息
醫學信息
의학신식
MEDICAL INFORMATION
2014年
37期
228-228
,共1页
全电视胸腔镜%开放式食管切除术%食管癌%临床疗效对比
全電視胸腔鏡%開放式食管切除術%食管癌%臨床療效對比
전전시흉강경%개방식식관절제술%식관암%림상료효대비
Thoracoscope%Open resection of esophagus%Esophageal carcinoma%Clinical curative ef ect contrast
目的：研究全电视胸腔镜与传统开放式食管切除术治疗食管癌的临床效果对比。方法将48例患者随机分成两组，即对照组和实验组，每组24例，对照组给予传统开放式食管切除术，实验组在全电视胸腔镜下行食管癌切除术，比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量。结果实验组手术时间、术中出血量均少于对照组，差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。结论全电视胸腔镜与传统开放式食管切除术治疗食管癌比较，减少手术时间及术中出血量，利于康复。
目的：研究全電視胸腔鏡與傳統開放式食管切除術治療食管癌的臨床效果對比。方法將48例患者隨機分成兩組，即對照組和實驗組，每組24例，對照組給予傳統開放式食管切除術，實驗組在全電視胸腔鏡下行食管癌切除術，比較兩組患者手術時間、術中齣血量。結果實驗組手術時間、術中齣血量均少于對照組，差異有統計學意義(<0.05)。結論全電視胸腔鏡與傳統開放式食管切除術治療食管癌比較，減少手術時間及術中齣血量，利于康複。
목적：연구전전시흉강경여전통개방식식관절제술치료식관암적림상효과대비。방법장48례환자수궤분성량조，즉대조조화실험조，매조24례，대조조급여전통개방식식관절제술，실험조재전전시흉강경하행식관암절제술，비교량조환자수술시간、술중출혈량。결과실험조수술시간、술중출혈량균소우대조조，차이유통계학의의(<0.05)。결론전전시흉강경여전통개방식식관절제술치료식관암비교，감소수술시간급술중출혈량，리우강복。
Objective To study the ful video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy with traditional open surgery clinical ef ect of esophageal contrast.Methods 48 patients were randomly divided into two groups, namely the control group and the experimental group,24 cases in each group,the control group received traditional open esophagectomy, resection of the experimental group in the whole thoracoscopic esophageal surgery patients were compared time,blood loss.Results The operative time,blood loss volume than the control group,the dif erence was statistical y significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Ful video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy with traditional open surgery treatment of esophageal cancer compared to reduce operative time and blood loss,conducive to rehabilitation.
