江苏科技大学学报（社会科学版）
江囌科技大學學報（社會科學版）
강소과기대학학보（사회과학판）
JOURNAL OF JIANGSU UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY（SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION）
2014年
4期
8-16
,共9页
《学记》%《雄辩术原理》%建制性基础
《學記》%《雄辯術原理》%建製性基礎
《학기》%《웅변술원리》%건제성기출
the Note of Learning%Institutes of Oratory%constructive basis
《学记》被称为“教育学的雏形”，却是“中国教诲观念的化石”。以朱熹和阿贝拉尔为例比较中西方的经学研究，以王守仁和罗耀拉为例比较中西方对于教育教学规律的认识和研究，以及比较我国南宋以后书院发展和欧洲早期大学合法化历程，“建制性基础缺失”应是《学记》“石化”的根本原因。《学记》所以“长不大”，王阳明所以难挽衰世之弊，书院所以要皈依科举，缺少 Logos、Law、Specialist、Religion 的维护和支持应是关键。
《學記》被稱為“教育學的雛形”，卻是“中國教誨觀唸的化石”。以硃熹和阿貝拉爾為例比較中西方的經學研究，以王守仁和囉耀拉為例比較中西方對于教育教學規律的認識和研究，以及比較我國南宋以後書院髮展和歐洲早期大學閤法化歷程，“建製性基礎缺失”應是《學記》“石化”的根本原因。《學記》所以“長不大”，王暘明所以難輓衰世之弊，書院所以要皈依科舉，缺少 Logos、Law、Specialist、Religion 的維護和支持應是關鍵。
《학기》피칭위“교육학적추형”，각시“중국교회관념적화석”。이주희화아패랍이위례비교중서방적경학연구，이왕수인화라요랍위례비교중서방대우교육교학규률적인식화연구，이급비교아국남송이후서원발전화구주조기대학합법화역정，“건제성기출결실”응시《학기》“석화”적근본원인。《학기》소이“장불대”，왕양명소이난만쇠세지폐，서원소이요귀의과거，결소 Logos、Law、Specialist、Religion 적유호화지지응시관건。
The Note of Learning is called the prototype of education,but also becomes the fossil of Chinese teachings ideas.Taking Zhuxi and Abelard as examples,we compare the classical philology of China with that of the West.Taking Wang Shouˉren and Loyola as examples we also compare the unˉ derstanding and research of the law of education of China with that of the West and the development of academies after the Southern Song Dynasty with the legalization of earlier universities in Europe.The fossilization of the Note of Learning should be ascribed to the deficiency of constructive basis.Why the Note of Learning can not be developed ,why WangYangming can not solve the problems and why academies turn to imperial examination are all due to the lack of maintenance and support from Logos, law,Specialist and Religion.
