中国实验诊断学
中國實驗診斷學
중국실험진단학
CHINESE JOURNAL OF LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS
2014年
12期
1990-1992
,共3页
尿液分析%全自动尿液分析%显微镜检查%复检规则
尿液分析%全自動尿液分析%顯微鏡檢查%複檢規則
뇨액분석%전자동뇨액분석%현미경검사%복검규칙
urinalysis%automatic urine analysis%microscopy%review criteria
目的:制定适合本实验室 Sysmex全自动尿液分析系统的尿液镜检复检规则。方法随机选择2014年3月到5月天津市第五中心医院门诊患者225份尿液标本对现有尿液复检规则进行临床有效性验证,最终通过漏诊率与复检率的结果来评判所制定的复检规则的可行性。结果以镜检结果为标准,225份尿样进行复检规则的验证,其符合率为90.2%(203/225),真阳性率39.56%(89/225),假阳性率8.44%(19/225),真阴性率50.67%(114/225),假阴性率(漏诊率)1.33%(3/225),复检率29.78%(67/225)。3例假阴性标本,均非泌尿科和肾病科患者,白细胞、红细胞镜检结果在3-8个/HP范围内,不会漏诊严重肾功能异常的患者。结论所制定的复检规则能够有效地筛选出真正需要镜检确认的异常标本,提高了工作效率及检验质量。
目的:製定適閤本實驗室 Sysmex全自動尿液分析繫統的尿液鏡檢複檢規則。方法隨機選擇2014年3月到5月天津市第五中心醫院門診患者225份尿液標本對現有尿液複檢規則進行臨床有效性驗證,最終通過漏診率與複檢率的結果來評判所製定的複檢規則的可行性。結果以鏡檢結果為標準,225份尿樣進行複檢規則的驗證,其符閤率為90.2%(203/225),真暘性率39.56%(89/225),假暘性率8.44%(19/225),真陰性率50.67%(114/225),假陰性率(漏診率)1.33%(3/225),複檢率29.78%(67/225)。3例假陰性標本,均非泌尿科和腎病科患者,白細胞、紅細胞鏡檢結果在3-8箇/HP範圍內,不會漏診嚴重腎功能異常的患者。結論所製定的複檢規則能夠有效地篩選齣真正需要鏡檢確認的異常標本,提高瞭工作效率及檢驗質量。
목적:제정괄합본실험실 Sysmex전자동뇨액분석계통적뇨액경검복검규칙。방법수궤선택2014년3월도5월천진시제오중심의원문진환자225빈뇨액표본대현유뇨액복검규칙진행림상유효성험증,최종통과루진솔여복검솔적결과래평판소제정적복검규칙적가행성。결과이경검결과위표준,225빈뇨양진행복검규칙적험증,기부합솔위90.2%(203/225),진양성솔39.56%(89/225),가양성솔8.44%(19/225),진음성솔50.67%(114/225),가음성솔(루진솔)1.33%(3/225),복검솔29.78%(67/225)。3례가음성표본,균비비뇨과화신병과환자,백세포、홍세포경검결과재3-8개/HP범위내,불회루진엄중신공능이상적환자。결론소제정적복검규칙능구유효지사선출진정수요경검학인적이상표본,제고료공작효솔급검험질량。
Objective To establish the proper review rules of the microscopic screening for Sysmex automatic urine analysis in our Lab.Methods Collecting 225 randomly selected urine samples were tested to validate these review rules.Omission diagnostic rate and review rate were used to evaluate the clinical practicability of the review rules.Re-sults 225 urine samples were assayed to further verify these review rules.The consistency rate was 90.2%(203/225), the true positive rate was39.56%(89/225),the false positive rate was 8.44%(19/225),the true negative rate was 50.67%(114/225),the false negative rate(omission diagnostic rate)was 1.33%(3/225),the review rate was29.78%(67/225).The 3 false negative samples selected by these review rules didn’t come from the nephropathy department or the urology department.And the microscopic results of RBC and WBC form these 3 samples ranged 3-8cells/HP.Thus, these review rules could avoid the missed diagnosis of patients with severe renal dysfunction.Conclusion The review rules established from this study for our Lab can effectively detect abnormal urine samples and improve the efficiency and the quality of urinalysis in routine clinical practice.